Couldn't find the answers for those questions. It'd be gratful if you help me
33. In a breach of contract case, the defense of mitigation of damages obligates the plaintiff to: A. Provide all information he or she has about damages to the defendant. B. Go through a mediation before ling his or her complaint. C. Be willing to accept alternative remedies other than damages. D. Make reasonable efforts to reduce the amount of his or her damages. 34. Which of the following is the best example of a manufacturing defect? A. The designer of a product miscalculated the product's strength resulting in injuries to Andropov. B. A piece of furniture was improperly assembled which caused Arvizu to break her nose and lose two teeth. C. Anto was injured because he ignored a warning about not ironing clothes while wearing them. D. Arias lost her job after a customer lied to Arias's supervisor about Arias's work ethic. 35. Andrews and Peters were in a car accident when Andrews ran a red light and hit Peters who, at that same time, was driving and texting. Peters sued Andrews based on personal injuries and property damage. Which of the following is Andrews' best defense? A. Assumption of the risk. B. Comparative negligence. C. Third party fault. D. Unclean hands. 36. Soto lost his cat and posted signs in his neighborhood offering a $100.00 reward for the cat's return. Dominguez found Soto's cat and returned the cat to Soto at Soto's house. Before Dominguez returned the cat to Soto, Dominguez saw one of Soto's signs offering the reward. Dominguez asked for the reward, but Soto refused to pay. Is Soto obligated to pay the reward to Dominguez? A. Yes, because Dominguez was going to return the cat to Soto anyway B. Yes, because Dominguez saw the sign offering the reward before returning the cat to Soto. C. No, because Dominguez was going to return the cat to Soto anyway. D. No, because Dominguez did not see the sign offering the reward before returning the cat to Soto. 37. Two men did substantial landscaping work at Floopy's house. Floopy had not asked the men to do this work but was happy to watch them do the work. The men gave Floopy a bill for their services ($500.00, which was a reasonable fee for the work). After discussing the matter, Floopy and the men determined that the men had mistakenly done the work at the wrong property. Should Floopy be obligated to pay the men for the work? A. Yes, because work of this type does not require a written contract. B. Yes, because otherwise unjust enrichment would result. C. No, because work of this type requires a written contract. D. No, because no unjust enrichment would result. 38. Farzad breached a written contract with Cyrus ve years ago. Cyrus led a lawsuit against Farzad based on this breach of written contract. The statute of limitations for breach of written contract is four years. Which of the following is correct? A. The contract is discharged by operation of law. B. The contract is discharged by novation. C. The contract is discharged by substantial performance. D. The contract is discharged by accord and satisfaction. Questions 39 and 40 are based on the following: Frosty went to a doctor due to back pain. Frosty told the doctor that he had hurt his back while lifting a large package of illegal goods. The doctor reported Frosty's statement to the police who arrested Frosty for trafcking in illegal goods. Frosty's lawyer was able to get the charges dismissed but not before Frosty had spent $30,000.00 for legal fees (he was also very upset about having to face criminal charges). Frosty sued the doctor for invasion of privacy. Frosty claimed damages for the legal fees in the amount of $30,000.00 plus emotional distress damages. (Questions 39 and 40 are on the next Page-) 39. What should be the result of Frosty's privacy case against the doctor? A. Frosty should win because the charges against him were dismissed. B. Frosty should win because he had a reasonable expectation of privacy. C. Frosty should lose because the charges against him were dismissed. D. Frosty should lose because he did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy. 40. Assume for the purposes of this question only that Frosty won the case. Which of the following is the best description of his damages based on emotional distress? A. General damages. B. Special damages. C. Consequential damages. D. Compensatory damages. Mgmt 246%F18 Second Exam 1 9
