COURSE: RISK MANAGEMENT HOSP314

those pictures are my post (answer) from case study posted in Discussion Board. Please answer the following Question.

Question:

1. What you learned from participating in the discussion?

2.. How you think your posted messages brought in new material, ideas, or personal experiences that related to the course material for that session?

3. The degree of analysis and self-reflection you engaged in and shared in the dialogue

1. Do you feel differently after viewing this video? How do you actually respond when you see someone with disabilities? . I don't feel different from those with disabilities; I can sense and understand them, even though they are born differently from what we see physically, but what they feel is the same as a normal person; people all over the world are born different and unique; some people are born normal and wealthy, but they act as if they own the world; they are rude and racist. Some people are born normal, yet they go on to commit serial murders, rapes, robberies, and other heinous crimes. This sort of conduct struck me as a disability. Be yourself when conversing with someone who has a handicap, just as you would with anybody else. In my words or actions, I will not be condescending. And I'll never ask a question that a person without a handicap would not ask. Not everyone with a condition wants to talk about his/her special limits or disability. 1. Is this the type of behavior that you have encountered or seen before? During my elementary and high school years, I witnessed a lot of bullies tormenting and harassing kids with disabilities. I know that those bullies don't comprehend the issue with disabilities yet, and I feel those bullies have a mental problem even if they are physically normal. But, I have never encountered such behaviors in the workplace. Discrimination in human rights acts is a great benefit and protects individuals with disabilities. 2. How would you react if any of these circumstances were done to you? This is not acceptable if any of these things happen to me. I'd have the impression that I'm indispensable at work, which might have an impact on my productivity. But I will fight to preserve my rights and equality since I believe it really is our right to work in a workplace free of discrimination and harassment. When we don't do something about it, it will happen repeatedly, not only to me, but possibly to my coworkers too though. The hotel were negligent in this situation. Even if Colin had ingested marijuana and alcohol that night or not, the hotel was nonetheless accountable for carelessness. This hotel was subject to liability for Mr. Colin Cruikshank's injuries, which happened on the hotel's elevator, proving that the establishment was negligent. This entails demonstrating that the hotel broke a duty owed to Mr. Colin and that the violation caused him harm. A hotel is required to check the hotel premises and keep the property in generally safe condition. This obligation entails fixing harmful circumstances as soon as possible and taking aggressive efforts to safeguard visitors from known or clearly accessible hazards. And also, a hotel does indeed have a general obligation to operate its company with proper precautions and to safeguard its visitors. A hotel visitor, referred to as a "invited guest" within property insurance law, is absolutely entitled to extensive protection. There are also a hotel's duties and responsibilities to their guests to ensure safety and hazard that should respond to these types of circumstances, and it is actually a common to hotel's duty to repair the problems to their facilities that also includes maintaining proper security with guards and cameras all over the place that can avoid theft and assaults on guests, exercising reasonable care in hiring hotel staff and training hotel pool staff to prevent injuries to guests, and so on... Whenever a hotel fails to check the properties on a regular basis, fails to keep the facilities relatively safe, or lacks to take reasonable precautions to alert guests of dangerous circumstances, it has likely broken its legal obligation to its guests. Q1. Do you agree with the decision? Why or why not? A1: I agree with the court's decision; it is always the obligation of the consumer to know the ingredients, especially if they have an allergy to any food, not just nuts, and the item name itself reads almond, which plainly indicates that it contains nuts. Thompson didn't even give instructions upon ordering to the restaurant about her allergy and she did not even ask about the almond chicken's ingredients. Thompson also gave a physician's letter stating that over two million Americans suffer from peanut allergies. A restaurant can fairly expect a client with a peanut allergy to follow the necessary steps to tell the establishment. Restaurants are concerned and aware that many people are allergic to peanuts. Restaurants have also procedures in place to prevent the contamination of peanuts. A restaurant must not be found responsible for an allergic reaction if a customer fails to tell the staff of their allergy. Q2. Would the outcome have been different if Thompson had advised Genghis Khan of her allergy to peanuts? Why or why not? A2. If Thompson had just told the restaurant about her allergy, the event may have been prevented; nevertheless, if the business forgot about the customer's food allergy instruction, the restaurant is accountable for food allergy negligence, and Thompson can sue the restaurant and file a lawsuit. This is a highly severe situation, and personnel should be extremely cautious and observant while providing meals to customers. Q3. Do you think restaurants should be required to ask patrons if they have food allergies? Why or why not? A3. Restaurants no longer ask every customer whether they have an allergy to any of the ingredients. I've worked at a few restaurants, and we never ask every customer. It is always the responsibility of the consumer who is aware of their sensitive food to request that their meal not contain certain components or to ask beforehand before ordering. Some people say that restaurants should be required to ask every customers upon ordering if they have any allergies; in my opinion, that might not be necessary. It is because many people with food allergies are 1. Do you feel differently after viewing this video? How do you actually respond when you see someone with disabilities? . I don't feel different from those with disabilities; I can sense and understand them, even though they are born differently from what we see physically, but what they feel is the same as a normal person; people all over the world are born different and unique; some people are born normal and wealthy, but they act as if they own the world; they are rude and racist. Some people are born normal, yet they go on to commit serial murders, rapes, robberies, and other heinous crimes. This sort of conduct struck me as a disability. Be yourself when conversing with someone who has a handicap, just as you would with anybody else. In my words or actions, I will not be condescending. And I'll never ask a question that a person without a handicap would not ask. Not everyone with a condition wants to talk about his/her special limits or disability. 1. Is this the type of behavior that you have encountered or seen before? During my elementary and high school years, I witnessed a lot of bullies tormenting and harassing kids with disabilities. I know that those bullies don't comprehend the issue with disabilities yet, and I feel those bullies have a mental problem even if they are physically normal. But, I have never encountered such behaviors in the workplace. Discrimination in human rights acts is a great benefit and protects individuals with disabilities. 2. How would you react if any of these circumstances were done to you? This is not acceptable if any of these things happen to me. I'd have the impression that I'm indispensable at work, which might have an impact on my productivity. But I will fight to preserve my rights and equality since I believe it really is our right to work in a workplace free of discrimination and harassment. When we don't do something about it, it will happen repeatedly, not only to me, but possibly to my coworkers too though. The hotel were negligent in this situation. Even if Colin had ingested marijuana and alcohol that night or not, the hotel was nonetheless accountable for carelessness. This hotel was subject to liability for Mr. Colin Cruikshank's injuries, which happened on the hotel's elevator, proving that the establishment was negligent. This entails demonstrating that the hotel broke a duty owed to Mr. Colin and that the violation caused him harm. A hotel is required to check the hotel premises and keep the property in generally safe condition. This obligation entails fixing harmful circumstances as soon as possible and taking aggressive efforts to safeguard visitors from known or clearly accessible hazards. And also, a hotel does indeed have a general obligation to operate its company with proper precautions and to safeguard its visitors. A hotel visitor, referred to as a "invited guest" within property insurance law, is absolutely entitled to extensive protection. There are also a hotel's duties and responsibilities to their guests to ensure safety and hazard that should respond to these types of circumstances, and it is actually a common to hotel's duty to repair the problems to their facilities that also includes maintaining proper security with guards and cameras all over the place that can avoid theft and assaults on guests, exercising reasonable care in hiring hotel staff and training hotel pool staff to prevent injuries to guests, and so on... Whenever a hotel fails to check the properties on a regular basis, fails to keep the facilities relatively safe, or lacks to take reasonable precautions to alert guests of dangerous circumstances, it has likely broken its legal obligation to its guests. Q1. Do you agree with the decision? Why or why not? A1: I agree with the court's decision; it is always the obligation of the consumer to know the ingredients, especially if they have an allergy to any food, not just nuts, and the item name itself reads almond, which plainly indicates that it contains nuts. Thompson didn't even give instructions upon ordering to the restaurant about her allergy and she did not even ask about the almond chicken's ingredients. Thompson also gave a physician's letter stating that over two million Americans suffer from peanut allergies. A restaurant can fairly expect a client with a peanut allergy to follow the necessary steps to tell the establishment. Restaurants are concerned and aware that many people are allergic to peanuts. Restaurants have also procedures in place to prevent the contamination of peanuts. A restaurant must not be found responsible for an allergic reaction if a customer fails to tell the staff of their allergy. Q2. Would the outcome have been different if Thompson had advised Genghis Khan of her allergy to peanuts? Why or why not? A2. If Thompson had just told the restaurant about her allergy, the event may have been prevented; nevertheless, if the business forgot about the customer's food allergy instruction, the restaurant is accountable for food allergy negligence, and Thompson can sue the restaurant and file a lawsuit. This is a highly severe situation, and personnel should be extremely cautious and observant while providing meals to customers. Q3. Do you think restaurants should be required to ask patrons if they have food allergies? Why or why not? A3. Restaurants no longer ask every customer whether they have an allergy to any of the ingredients. I've worked at a few restaurants, and we never ask every customer. It is always the responsibility of the consumer who is aware of their sensitive food to request that their meal not contain certain components or to ask beforehand before ordering. Some people say that restaurants should be required to ask every customers upon ordering if they have any allergies; in my opinion, that might not be necessary. It is because many people with food allergies are