Question
Covid-19, Russia's invasion of Ukraine, and rising geopolitical risks in Asia have thrown a wrench into global supply chains, writes The Wall Street Journal (Sept.
- Covid-19, Russia's invasion of Ukraine, and rising geopolitical risks in Asia have thrown a wrench into global supply chains," writes The Wall Street Journal (Sept. 20, 2022). That has reinvigorated the push to put key supply links back onshoreparticularly those currently located in China. A full "decoupling," meaning the breaking of economic links with China, remains unlikely, but supply chains would become less integrated than in the past.
Two proposed laws in Europe are the latest case in point. The EU just set forth a ban on products made using forced labor. (It doesn't name China but forced labor in the Xinjiang region is clearly a main target.) Recent U.S. legislation puts the onus on importers to prove that products from Xinjiang aren't made with forced laboran incredibly high bar. Such rearrangements could be challenging in some cases: For example in the solar supply chain, which is dominated by China. Xinjiang is a major producer of polysilicon, a crucial precursor of solar cells.
Another proposal from Europe tries to directly address such dominance, which also extends to the processing of lithium and other minerals critical for green energy applications. That law would attempt to speed up domestic production, processing and recycling of such raw materials. "Lithium and rare earths will soon be more important than oil and gas," said EU's Commission president. China processes almost 90% of rare earths and 60% of lithium.
All of this follows similar moves in the U.S. A recent law provides incentives for domestic manufacturing of clean-energy products such as batteries and solar panels. The U.S. is also implementing policies to encourage the onshoring of semiconductors and biotechnology. Such onshoring will take years and a full-scale relocation of manufacturing jobs back to the West is unrealistic. Friendlier or closer countries such as Vietnam and Mexico will probably be big beneficiariesparticularly those that already have free-trade agreements with the U.S. or the EU.
The rapid globalization of the past few decades seems likely to take a pause. Businesses, consumers and governments will gain a measure of reliability and peace of mindbut they should be prepared to pay up too.
Questions:
- What are the benefits and dangers of the new U.S. and EU laws?
- Is the globalization era ending? Why or why not? Explain
- What are some of the unintended consequences of in-shoring? Discuss
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started