Create a list of other things that would also likely NOT be classied as a \"good\" because of this ruling: \"Indiana has subjected public utility companies to liability for producing electricity by holding that the sale of electricity does involve the sale of a "good" under the Uniform Commercial Code. See W549, 151 Ind. App. 176, 278 N. E. 2d 608 (1972). Indiana has limited this holding to cases where the electricity has passed the customer's electric meter See WM\" 171 Ind. App. 14, 354 N.E.2d 736 (1976). Indiana supports this conclusion by f ndIng that electricity is a thing existing and moveable. The court in Helvey, applying the denition of a "good" under the Uniform Commercial Code, said "logic would indicate that whatever can be measured in order to establish the price to be paid would be indicative of fullling both the existing and moveable requirements of goods.' 'Heivey, 151 Ind. App. 176, 178, 278 N.E.2d 608, 610 (1972).\" Do you agree with this case? How does this seem similar or dissimilar to the Cryolife case ruling