Criteria Unsatisfactory-Beginning Developing Accomplished Exemplary Ideas, Arguments, & Analysis 0-30 points Ideas expressed lack an understanding of the discussion topic. Comments are irrelevant, off-topic, and/or confusing to follow. Viewpaint, if given, is not supported with evidence or examples. Does not utilize the given template. Ideas expressed in discussion posts show |ldeas expressed in discussion a minimal understanding of the posts are mostly substantive and discussion topic. Comments are general |relevant to topic: some original in nature and/or occasionally may not be |thought. Demaonstrates logical relevant. Rehashes or summarizes ideas |thinking, reasoning, and,/or 'with limited analysis, original thought. and/or supported viewpeoints. Utilizes the given template, but not completely, missing parts of it. analysis for most part. Viewpoint is supported with evidence and/or examples. Utilizes the given temnplate and completes all sections. lldeas expressed in discussion posts include original thought, substantial depth, and are relevant to topic. Viewpoint shows strong logical thinking, reasoning, and analysis with evidence and examples. Construction of new meaning and insights are evident. Utilizes the ziven template and completes all sections thoroughly. Connection to Course Materials Writing Quality| 0-13 points Mo connections are made to readings or other course materials (lectures, media, resources, etc.), and/or if made, are not clearly stated and are largely personal opinions. 0-6 points Posts show a below average/poor|Posts show an average and/or casual writing style that lacks standard English, and/or is difficult for readers to follow. Contains frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. 14-15 points 16-17 points Minimal direct connections are made to [Some direct connections are made readings and/or other course materials (lectures, media, resources, etc.). [Connections are largely inferred and somewhat unclear at times. to readings and/or other course materials {lectures, media, resources, etc.) and are clearly stated for the most part. 35-39 points 40-44 points 45-50 points 150 720) 710 18-20 points Etrong, direct connections are made to readings and/or other course materials {lectures, media, resources, etc.) and are clearly stated. Discussion posts show above writing style using standard English that |average writing style that is clear is generally clear but contains some using standard English with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, |errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling. usage, and/or spelling. Discussion posts are well written and clearly articulated using standard English, characterized by elements of| a strong writing style with correct grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Required Paostings/ Deduct 4 points-overall failing Deduct 1-3 points No points deducted 1 bonus point Connection to Course Materials 0-13 points Mo connections are made to readings or other course materials (lectures, media, 14-15 points readings and/or other course materials [lectures, media, resources, etc.). resources, etc.), and/or if made, |Connections are largely inferred and are not clearly stated and are largely personal opinions. somewhat unclear at times. 16-17 points 18-20 points Minimal direct connections are made to [Some direct connections are made to readings and/or other course rnaterials (lectures, media, resources, etc.) and are clearly stated for the most part. Btrong, direct connections are made to readings and/or other course materials {lectures, media, resources, etc.) and are clearly ctated. 20 Required Postings/ Timeliness Rubric by Denise Kreiger, Instructional Design/Technology Services, SCEI, Rutgers, 3/2014; Modified by K.M. Fleva, YSU, 1/2024. 0-6 points 7 points Posts show a below average/poor|Posts show an average and/or casual writing style that lacks standard [writing style using standard English that English, and/or is difficult for readers to follow. Contains frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Deduct 4 points-overall failing is generally clear but contains some ITOrs in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Deduct 1-3 points 8 points Discussion posts show above average writing style that is clear using standard English with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and/or spelling. No points deducted 9-10 points Discussion posts are well written and clearly articulated using standard English, characterized by elements of a strong writing style with correct grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. 1 bonus point Some required postings missing by deadline &/or there was not adequate time for others to read and respond to postings prior to deadline. All required postings by deadline: however there was not adequate time for others to read and respond to some postings prior to deadline, All required postings by deadline [required=1 posting + 2 replies to classmates); adequate time for others to read and respond prior to deadline. Exceeds required postings; postings are early into the discussion and throughout the discussion: provides more than enough time for classmates to read and respond prior to deadline. Discussion Topic Details & 3-0 Discussion - Module 1 Post a response to the following discussion prompt no later than Thursday of this week at 23:59 PM EST. Then follow- up on at least three classmates' posts by Sunday of this week at 23:59 PM EST. Before posting to this discussion, please watch the following brief (2 min) video on netiquette: Grading b Discussion Board Netiquette D Find parti ations Ra (M Reflect on this before creating your post: Ta Review all the readings that have been given to you in your course module. Consider which of these employment laws has affected you. Identify three specific incidents and how they have Te affected you kow consider the losielation soulmund in the module and cancider if anu changer are in order forEmployee Relations Module 1: Discussion Employee & Labor Relations: Shaped by Employment Law Discussion Topic Q} Details & Information Due Date @ Discussion - Module 1 5/16/24, 11:59 PM (EDT) Post a response to the following discussion prompt no later than Thursday of this week at 23:5% PM EST. Then follow- up on at least three classmates' posts by Sunday of this week at 23:59 PM EST. Before posting to this discussion, please ;EE Grading rubric watch the following brief (2 min) video on netiquette: - This item is graded with 4 rubt Grading Maximum grade Find particiy Rasha Ali (Me) Reflect on this before creating your post: EY e 2. 3. Find parti 2. Employment Law Changes Employment laws that I would eliminate, modify or add as a new law is OR explain a new law. I would eliminate/modify/add this law because: Reason 1 Ta Reason 2 Reason 3 Te Your Replies (Reply to at least 2) DDiscussion Topic Details how this impacted your employment experience> 3. 2. Employment Law Changes Employment laws that I would eliminate, modify or add as a new law is OR Grading explain a new law. I would eliminate/modify/add this law because: Reason 1 Reason 2 Reason 3 Your Replies (Reply to at least 2) Find parti In your reply, identify posts where the individual experienced employment laws in a similar manner to yourself. Compare and contrast the benefits or challenges you experienced with that of the poster, noting why you think these might be similar (or different). Grading Rubric: Ta Discussion Board Grading Rubric.docx Te id(0); D