Critique this research study

Research Study: The Essential Moral Self

1. Select a peer-reviewed journal article and describe its relevance to you personally or professionally in about 50 to 75 words.

I settled on a peer-reviewed journal project titled "Children's Response to Physical and Moral Events," which is relevant to my work of helping families, children, and addicts to reunite and live a healthy lifestyle. The significance of the matter drew my attention to it. As someone who grew up in an abusive household, I've always been fascinated by children's psychology. For numerous years, I worked in a pediatric office and was required to do numerous hours of training on children and their conduct. I suppose this article is about the power of words in the presence of youngsters. When it comes to children, I feel that words have enormous power.

1. Describe the purpose of the peer-reviewed journal article in about 25 to 50 words.

The main aim of the peer-reviewed journal initiative is to educate readers about infractions and "Hate," a common human emotion, as seen through the eyes of youngsters as a result of their affiliation or the reaction to the use of a specific term when spoken or written, as mentioned by J. Danovitch and P. Bloom in 2009.

1. Identify the major methodological design of the peer-reviewed journal article in about 25 to 50 words.

This study's methodological design is experimental and correlational. The article publication claims to be experimental, and each section is named accordingly (for example, EXPERIMENT 1, EXPERIMENT 2, and so on). It is correlational in the sense that they are looking to see if a child associates particular objects with the emotion disgust. (J. Danovitch and P. Bloom, 2009).

1. Identify strengths and weaknesses of the specific measurement used to operationalize one of the key variables in about 50 to 100 words.

When they changed the way the questions were worded, they prevented the guys from vying to see who could be disgusted by the most things. They also had the advantage of asking the same questions but changing the subject to examine physiological and moral aversion. Because they only looked at the reactions of boys and not those of girls, the measurements and technique are incorrect. Inclusion of women could have resulted in more in-depth and comprehensive knowledge. As a result, rather than "Children's extension...", the title should read "Boys' extension..." The experiment was somewhat slanted overall, but it was mainly fair and near-perfect. P. Bloom and J. Danovitch (2009).

1. Identify the key variables and how they were operationalized in the study (i.e., what measures were used) in about 100 to 150 words.

Gender, grade level, age, and emotion are the most critical distaste variables. Because the boys attempted to make it a competition, gender was operationalized in experiment 1 by modifying the phrasing of the questions. Furthermore, because the trial only included boys, the grade level was determined by comparing pupils in kindergarten, second, and fourth grades. Their grades were used to operationalize their ages. The researchers' goal was to collect data on how young boys (boys) interpret both physical and moral disgust, hence disgust was operationalized throughout the study. P. Bloom and J. Danovitch (2009).

References

P. Bloom and J. Danovitch (2009).

Critique this research journal

BY

1. Analyze the introduction section of the research study in about 50 to 100 words. Include the following in your response: A. The title of the article B. The purpose of the study C. How the article's introductory content is relevant and how it logically leads into the study

2. Analyze the method section of the research study in about 250 to 350 words. Include the following in your response: A. The study's method and design B. The study's primary hypothesis and claim C. How the method and design align with the primary hypothesis to reach a strong conclusion D. How the researchers made measurements and whether they were good choices for the conceptual variables E. How the researchers obtained participants, how many participants there were, and their characteristics F. The sampling characteristics (sample size, strategy, composition, etc.) as they relate to this study

3. Analyze the results section of the research study in about 50 to 100 words. Include the following in your response: A. The "big idea" of the analysis (compare means, look for relationships, assess frequency, etc.) B. How the primary hypothesis was supported C. The analysis used for the primary hypothesis

4. Analyze the discussion section of the research study in about 150 to 200 words. Include the following in your response: A. The major findings B. The strengths and limitations described in the study C. The conclusions and whether they were supported by the method that the researchers used D. Whether the claims and inferences the researchers draw seem appropriate, given their findings E. How the study could be improved or extended in future research