D Question 2 1 pts Type 1 errors: O Are more likely to happen when the confidence level is low O Are the same as Type A errors O Are less likely to happen when the probability of a type 2 error is super low Can be completely eliminated O Won't happen in the small sample caseOne of the problems with the conclusion "fail to reject the null hypothesis" is that O We can't account for how much dispersion there is in the underlying data O We don't account for the sample size, except by choosing a t or a z-score O We may not really believe the null hypothesis, it's just that we haven't marshalled enough evidence to reject it Our rejection region may be too far from the critical value The word "reject" hurts people's feelingsSuppose you decide to drive drunk under the presumption that you won't get caught. A cop notices that you are drifting and decides to investigate. The end result is that you have to go to jail for aggravated driving while intoxicated. Then, O You committed a type 1 error, the cop committed no error You committed no error, the cop committed a type 1 error O You committed a type 2 error, the cop committed no error O You committed a type 1 error, the cop committed a type 2 error O Ketchup is way better than mustardA type 2 error occurs when: O You reject the null but should not have O You fail to reject the null, when you should have rejected it O When you execute an innocent man O When you fail to reach a conclusion O Mustard is way better than ketchupSuppose you own a restaurant and have a cook whose ability and attitude you are suspicious of. One of the dishes on the menu is duck cassoulet, which uses duck legs that have been slow fried over a couple of hours in oil that does not exceed a temperature of 175 degrees. This is a time consuming and monotonous process, but one that results in excellent meat that you sell for a large mark-up. You suspect your cook is lazy and doesn't properly monitor and maintain the oil temperature. You take a random sample of 15 duck legs and take them to a forensics lab where you are able to discover the maximum temperature the meat has reached. Within your sample the mean maximum temperature of the duck legs is 180 degrees with a standard deviation of 4 degrees. Meat cooked precisely to 175 degrees is what your cook is supposed to do. Which of the following is true about a hypothesis test for the claim that your employee is capable (meaning he doesn't over-fry the meat) at the 90% confidence level. O Reject the null with a test statistic value of 1.83 O Reject the null with a test statistic value of 2.17 Fail to reject the null with a test statistic value of 1.59 Fail to the null with a test statistic value of 1.47 O None of the above are true