D Question 24 Lindenwood Materials, Inc. is a Missouri corporation located in St. Charles, Missouri. Lindenwood entered into a contract to provide certain building materials for a construction project in St. Charles, Missouri. The project specifications required that the aluminum pipe for the project be coated and sealed with a specific product made by Engineered Coatings and Sealants (ECS), a Pennsylvania corporation located in Scranton, Pennsylvania. Lindenwood Materials reviewed ECS's website for information about its coating and sealant products. ECS's website provided detailed information on the various coatings and sealants manufactured by it, warranties for the product, and the recommended uses of each coating and sealant. The website also provided a state by state list of ECS approved applicators of ECS's coatings and applicants. Lindenwood contracted with Finishing Dynamics, an ECS approved applicator. Finishing Dynamics is located in Jackson, Missouri. Lindenwood learned of Finishing Dynamics through the ECS website and obtained the contact information for Finishing Dynamics from the ECS website. Lindenwood selected Finishing Dynamics for the project in St. Charles because of the recommendations made by ECS on its website. Finishing Dynamics improperly applied the coating to the aluminum pipes, rendering them defective and unusable for the construction project. Lindenwood incurred losses of $1,800,000 from Finishing Dynamics's negligent application of the coatings as Lindenwood had to replace all of the defective pipes on the project and have the new pipes coated again with the ECS product. Lindenwood sues both Finishing Dynamics and ECS in Missouri state court in St. Charles County, Missouri. ECS files a motion to dismiss Lindenwood's lawsuit for lack of personal jurisdiction, alleging that ECS is not a Missouri corporation and has no offices in Missouri. You are the judge. How do you rule ECS's motion to dismiss? Thoroughly explain your