D Question 53 53. Which of the following is not consistent with a utilitarian approach to business ethics? O Cost-benefit analysis O Decisions that provide the greatest good to the most people O Financial statement balance sheets in which assets and liabilities are fully listed O A close adherence to the ethical rules set forth in sacred religious texts O "The ends justify the means"Question 54 54. Anti-Trust law prohibits - O Bad acts used to acquire or maintain a monopoly O Agreements between companies "in restraint of trade" O All of the other four substantive answers listed in this question O Tying arrangements requiring that if a customer buys Product X, the customer must also buy Product Y as well O Price fixingD Question 55 55. Assumption of the Risk is a valid defense to use against a claim of - O Negligence O Battery O Breach of Contract O Defamation O FraudQuestion 56 0.5 pt 56. Michelle owns a top-floor apartment in an apartment building in Washington, DC with a balcony overlooking Pennsylvania Avenue, where Presidential inaugural parades occur every 4 years. Nicole loves inaugural parades and enters into a contract to rent Michelle's apartment for $10,000 for the afternoon of Thursday, January 21, 2021 to watch President Biden's inaugural parade. However, the parade is actually on Wednesday, January 20, 2021 (one day earlier). Nicole learns of the date mix-up on Tuesday, January 19, 2021 (one day before the parade), and tells Michelle she is cancelling the contract, but Michelle responds that Nicole is bound by the contract and that Nicole owes Michelle $10,000. Nicole does not pay Michelle the $10,000 called for in the contract. If Michelle sues Nicole for breach of contract, who will likely win? O Nicole because of the precedent set by Hawkins v. McGee (1929) O Nicole because of the precedent set by Sherwood v. Walker (1887) O Michelle because of the precedent set by Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad (1928) O Michelle because of the precedent set by International Shoe v. State of Washington (1945) O Nicole because of the precedent set by Hadley v. Baxendale (1854)