dak 3 diferene types of alcohol, and have 5 differemt pets. The ouses are lined wp in a row. THE QUESTION 1S: WHO people 5 dferent cigar brands 7. The owner of the yellow house smokes Dunhill. &The man living in the center house drinks milk 9 The Norwegian lives in the first house. WNS THE FISH he Brit ives ie the red house. he Swede keeps dogs as pets The man who smokes Ilends lives next to the one who keeps cats 11. The man who keeps the horse lives next so the man who smokes Dunhilm 12. The owner who smokes Bloemasiers drinks beer 1 ne Dane drinks tea M gen house is on the left of the whine house e green house's owner drinks coffee. he perion who smokes Pall Mall rears binds. 13. The German smokes prince. 14. The Norwegian lives next to the blue house. 15. The man who smokes Blends has a neighbor who drinks water. QUESTIONS REVIEW &wis the threshold for predication determined? What are the challenges associated with proving intent on the part of a How do witness interviewing and interrogation differ? 6 How might documents be altered? 7. dster What are some ways used to hide assets? 8. What oonstitutes evidence? Wht are the three types of evidence that may be offered at trial? 9. When is it appropriate to use an indirect method for income reconstruction? she is meant by invigilation? 10. Where may fraud examiners and forensic accountants find data? MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS Which of the following is not true with regard to predication? A Predication is generally the starting point for a fraud examination RProdication would suggest that the suspected perpetrator should be intermogated c. Once the predication threshold has been reached, the need to oonsider issues such as the rights of individuals and probable Which of the following attributes of a fraud examination often provides 2. the most compelling evidence of intent on the part of a fraudster? A. Perceived peessure B. The fraud act C. Conversion D. Concealment cause is enhanced n Predication is defined as the totality of circumstances that would lead a reasonable, professionally trained, and prudent individual to believe a fraud has occurred. Which of the following is not true with regard to evidence? A. Evidence is anything legally admitted at trial. B. Evidence is anything perceivable by the five senses: sight, hearing. touch, smell, and taste. 3. By Cantints 318 EVIDENCE-BASED FRAUD EXAMINATIONS 7. Evidence is coincidental with proof. C. D.Evidence is anything relevant to the issue under consideration. Multiple thaves questons 1-3 plhase thanks