1. Dana, a restaurant worker, suffered significant injury when a Pepsi Cola bottle exploded near her face while she was moving a case of Pepsi Cola drinks into the restaurant's refrigerator. The bottles had been stored undisturbed in the restaurant's pantry after being delivered three days earlier. The bottler had subjected the bottle to the method of testing for defects commonly used in the industry, and there is no evidence that Dana or anyone else did anything to damage the bottle between its delivery and the explosion. Dana is suing Pepsi Cola for the damages she suffered.She is unable to show specific acts of negligence on the part of Pepsi Cola and would like to use the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. Would she be able to use this tort doctrine? Please explain.