Daniel Franco, a free-lance gaming consultant and blogger, needed a new gaming system for his business.After some lengthy review, Daniel decided to purchase a Nintendo Switch system for his business needs.Weeks after the one-year warranty expired, Daniel's Nintendo Switch failed to operate due to a flaw in the product manufacture.Daniel sued Nintendo, making the argument that the gaming system should have lasted "at least a couple of years," which Daniel viewed as a reasonable consumer expectation for such an expensive gaming system.Daniel argued that Nintendo's description of the gaming system as "most reliable", and "durable", were affirmative statements concerning the quality and performance of the gaming system, which Nintendo did not meet.How should the court rule?Why?

Using the IRAC method explained in the example and in chapter one of your text, submit your answer for grading.