Daniel had worked for Classy Casino for 14 years, first as a dealer and eventually as a games manager, when he was approached by the owners of Lucky Stars, a casino that would soon open. Looking to staff the new casino with the "best people in the business," they offered him more money and better benefits, a larger bonus, and greater opportunities for promotions than he currently had. Daniel eventually accepted. However, 18 months after Daniel started working at Lucky Stars, he was terminated without just cause and given two weeks' pay as required under the Employment Standards Act. Considering this amount insufficient, Daniel sued for wrongful dismissal damages under the common law. The court found that, based on the factors normally taken into consideration in determining "reasonable notice" under the common lawhis age (41) at the time of dismissal, his mid-management position, his length of service (relatively short), and the availability of similar employmentit would have awarded him two months' pay in lieu of notice. However, Daniel argued that he was entitled to more, based on the employer's pre-hiring statements. Do you think a court would agree? Provide reasons supporting your decision