Daniel is an individual with a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act. He is legally blind. Daniel applies for position as a certified nutritionist at a large city hospital. He does not have his certification in nutrition yet, but he has taken more than $75\%$ of the required course work. As an accommodation, he would need special software to help him read text on his computer. Daniel is not hired for the position. Daniel asks you whether you think he has a claim against the hospital under the Americans with Disabilities Act, you say:

Yes, the accommodation Daniel was requesting $($a special software to read text on his computer$)$ was reasonable, therefore the hospital should have hired him and provided the accommodation.

Yes, Daniel was a qualified person with a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act

No$,$ the accommodation Daniel was requesting $($a special software to read text on his computer$)$ was NOT reasonable, therefore the hospital had not obligation to hire him.

No$,$ Daniel was not otherwise qualified for the position, therefore, the hospital had no obligation to hire him.

Both A and B