Danny, the owner of an internet sales business, had been dating Britany for about a year. The two broke up because she realized Danny thought of himself as \"macho\" and she preferred someone who was more sensitive. After breaking up, she posted on her social site pictures of Danny wearing an apron and cleaning the carpet in mother's apartment. Thinking it was funny, and not intending any harm, she also added the caption, "Girly Man.\" Danny's friends started sharing the photo and comment, and Danny became incensed. He sued Britany on various grounds. Should he win on his claim of false light? 0 No answer text provided. 0 A. Yes, because Britany's posting constituted innuendo that Danny was less than macho, and this was defamatory per se. 0 B. Yes, because Britany's posting put Danny in a false light. 0 C. No, because anyone viewing the picture would have understood the posting was meant to be a joke. 0 D. No, because everyone who knew Danny knew that he was \"macho.\" Chuck is a private pilot. One day, while piloting his single engine aircraft, a large bird collided with windshield of the plane, causing Chuck to lose control and crash into a home below owned by Delilah. Delilah sues on numerous grounds, including trespass. Will Delilah prevail in her claim that Chuck trespassed because the plane crashed into her house? 0 No answer text provided. 0 A. Yes, because the plane entered onto Delilah's property by crashing into her house. 0 B. Yes, because it is foreseeable that a single-engine aircraft can crash when hit by birds. 0 C. No, because Chuck did not intend to enter onto Delilah's property by crashing into her house. 0 D. No, because Chuck did not intend to enter onto Delilah's property