Dara was scheduled to undergo surgery for removal of her appendix. Her family doctor, Dr. Jones, was scheduled to do the surgery but called out of town because his father was ill. Even though Dara's condition was not considered an emergency, the hospital decided to go ahead with the surgery and to substitute another doctor, Dr. Weuss. Dr. Weuss was considered to be an expert in the field. Dara was not informed of the substitution of doctors. If Dara sues Dr. Weuss for battery, what will be the likely result? O No answer text provided. O A. Dara will recover only if the operation did not improve her physical well-being because Dr. Weuss is an expert. O B. Dara will prevail regardless of whether Dr. Weuss' surgery improved her condition. O C. Dr. Weuss will prevail because he was better qualified than Dr. Jones, Dara's family doctor. O D. Dr. Weuss will prevail if Dr. Jones approved of the substitution.Donald was a resident at Final Journey Senior Community located in Utah City. When Donald's car broke down, he started borrowing his neighbor Karl's old car once a month to go to his regularly scheduled foot doctor's appointments. A running joke developed between the two men about Donald being an \"old Cheapskate" and when Donald would nally break down and purchase his own car. One day, when Karl wasn't home because he was playing bridge at the clubhouse, Donald went to Karl's house to borrow the car. Donald knew the car was kept in Karl's unlocked garage and that Karl left the keys in the ignition. When Donald started the car, he could see that the radiator coolant level light was on, indicating the radiator was low in coolant. Donald took the car to his foot doctor without stopping to add coolant, and the car overheated, causing the car's radiator to crack. Luckily, the head gasket did not rupture. The radiator had to be replaced at a cost of $500, but because the local mechanic did not have the part in stock, it took over a week to replace it. Donald paid for the cost of the repair, and after the work was done, Donald promptly returned it to Karl. Karl, being upset at his neighbor's carelessness, decidds to sue his neighbor Donald in Small Claims Court (mainly to get him to buy his own car). Recalling some of the topics he learned when he took business law at what was then called Valley State College in Northridge during the late 1960's, Karl led a Small Claims action claiming conversion. Will Karl succeed on his conversion claim? 0 No answer text provided. 0 A. Yes, because even though he gave Donald permission to use the car to make his doctor's appointments, Karl was dispossessed of his use of the car for over a week. 0 B. Yes, because Donald should have known better than to run the car without lling the radiator with coolant. O C. No, because Karl's car wasn't worth repairing as it was old. 0 D. No, because Karl paid for the repairs, and he made sure to return the car to Karl as soon as the radiator was replaced