Data Analysis Report #2: Comparing the Global Social Values of Nations

Description:

For this report, we are evaluating how the social values of people in the US compare with folks in other countries. Using data from the World Values Survey Wave 7 (provided), you will be asked to state a comparative research question, assert hypotheses, report descriptive statistics, perform a two-sample hypothesis test, make a decision based on the results, and provide an informed reflection on how your results fit into research and the Sustainable Development Goals set forth by the United Nations.

Materials:

• Download Assignment Instructions: STA2122 Data Analysis Report 2 Spring 2023.pdf Download STA2122 Data Analysis Report 1 Spring 2023.pdf Download STA2122 Data Analysis Report 2 Spring 2023.pdf Download STA2122 Data Analysis Report 1 Spring 2023.pdf
  • This document contains the instructions, rubric, example, data information, and SPSS instructions needed to complete the assignment.
• Download NEW SPSS data file:DAR2 WVS Data STA2122 SP23.savDownload DAR2 WVS Data STA2122 SP23.sav
  • Sample: Read about Data and Sampling information in the guidebook
• SPSS Resources:Technology Information and Resources
• I will be hosting a recorded LIVE REVIEW session for DAR #2
  • View a recording of Dr. Toothman's LIVE review session on MS Teams from Tuesday 3/28 from 10-11am (login required)Links to an external site.Links to an external site.

1. This assignment due by 11:59pm on FRIDAY.You have atwo-day grace periodto upload the assignment after the due date (ending at 11:59pm on Sunday).Technical difficulties at the last minute are not acceptable excuses for late work, so if you're encountering an uploading error, you must email us your work before the deadline to be considered for credit. We do not accept papers via email.
2. Read the gradingchecklist andrubriclocated in the assignment instructions.Proofreadyour report.
3. Please read the following statements aboutacademicdishonestycarefully:
   1. Your assignment will be assessed usingTurnitinplagiarism detection software. It must be saved in.doc OR .docx format. I cannot accept .pdf files or links to Google Docs.
   2. This paper is part summary, analysis, and synthesis. You are expected to use your own language throughout the entire paper. Papers that includeblock quotations, rephrasing, and search-and-replace wording, are considered in violation of academic integrity.Do you own work.
   3. You are responsible for the correct and timely submission of your work.The document you upload is considered your final submission, so be sure it's correct version of your work. Uploading repeated assignments or "placeholder" assignments is considered academic dishonesty. If you upload something in error, immediately upload the correct assignment as a second submission.
   4. Teamworkis great. I encourage students to ethically use their resources to generate good work. However, attempting to pass a friend's work (or the same reports they found) as your own is cheating - even if you change some words around using a thesaurus.

Rubric for DAR #2

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 1: Sample information.See the guidebook for a description of all criteria.

1 pts Complete

0 pts Incomplete

1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 1: Variable information.

1 pts Complete

0 pts Incomplete

1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 1: Opening/Closing line and assumptions.

1 pts Complete

0 pts Incomplete

1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 2: Research Question.

1 pts Complete

0 pts Incomplete

1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 2: Hypothesis statements.

1 pts Complete

0 pts Incomplete

1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3: Test information and critical values.

1 pts Complete

0 pts Incomplete

1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 4: Statistics.

1 pts Complete

0 pts Incomplete

1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 4: Annotations.

1 pts Complete

0 pts Incomplete

1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 5: Hypothesis decision.

1 pts Complete

0 pts Incomplete

1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 5: Hypothesis interpretation.

1 pts Complete

0 pts Incomplete

1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 6: Informed Reflection.

1 pts Complete

0 pts Incomplete

1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 6: Critical Reflection.

1 pts Complete

0 pts Incomplete

1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 6: Thinking Forward.

1 pts Complete

0 pts Incomplete

1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 6: Opening/Closing line and style.

1 pts Complete

0 pts Incomplete

1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 7: References and presentation quality.

1 pts Complete

0 pts Incomplete

1 pts

Total Points: 15