Data for Barry Computer Co. and its industry averages follow. The firm's debt is priced at par, so the market value of its debt equals its book value. Since dollars are in thousands, number of shares are shown in thousands too.

Barry Computer Company:
Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2018 (In Thousands)
Cash	$65,000		Accounts payable	$221,000
Receivables	494,000		Other current liabilities	156,000
Inventories	351,000		Notes payable to bank	117,000
Total current assets	$910,000		Total current liabilities	$494,000
			Long-term debt	$299,000
Net fixed assets	390,000		Common equity (50,700 shares)	507,000
Total assets	$1,300,000		Total liabilities and equity	$1,300,000

Barry Computer Company: Income Statement for Year Ended December 31, 2018 (In Thousands)
Sales			$2,600,000
Cost of goods sold
Materials	$1,274,000
Labor	650,000
Heat, light, and power	104,000
Indirect labor	104,000
Depreciation	52,000		2,184,000

Gross profit	$	416,000
Selling expenses		312,000
General and administrative expenses	$	52,000
Earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT)	$	52,000
Interest expense		29,900
Earnings before taxes (EBT)	$	22,100
Federal and state income taxes (40%)		8,840
Net income	$	13,260
Earnings per share	$	0.26154
Price per share on December 31, 2018	$	14.00

1. Calculate the indicated ratios for Barry. Round your answers to two decimal places.

   Ratio	Barry	Industry Average
   Current	__x	1.77x
   Quick	__x	1.18x
   Days sales outstandinga	__days	33.02 days
   Inventory turnover	__x	7.94x
   Total assets turnover	__x	2.33x
   Profit margin	__%	0.49%
   ROA	__%	1.13%
   ROE	__%	2.78%
   ROIC	__%	8.00%
   TIE	__x	1.69x
   Debt/Total capital	__%	43.97%
   M/B	__%	5.40%
   P/E	__%	56.53%
   EV/EBITDA	__%	12.36%

   ^aCalculation is based on a 365-day year.
2. Construct the DuPont equation for both Barry and the industry. Round your answers to two decimal places.

   	FIRM	INDUSTRY
   Profit margin	__%	0.49%
   Total assets turnover	__x	2.33x
   Equity multiplier	__ x	__x

3. Select the correct option based on Barry's strengths and weaknesses as revealed by your analysis. Either I, II, III, IV, or V
   1. The firm's days sales outstanding ratio is more than the industry average, indicating that the firm should tighten credit or enforce a more stringent collection policy. The total assets turnover ratio is well above the industry average so sales should be increased, assets increased, or both. While the company's profit margin is higher than the industry average, its other profitability ratios are low compared to the industry - net income should be higher given the amount of equity, assets, and invested capital. However, the company seems to be in an above average liquidity position and financial leverage is similar to others in the industry.
   2. The firm's days sales outstanding ratio is comparable to the industry average, indicating that the firm should neither tighten credit nor enforce a more stringent collection policy. The total assets turnover ratio is well below the industry average so sales should be increased, assets increased, or both. While the company's profit margin is higher than the industry average, its other profitability ratios are low compared to the industry - net income should be higher given the amount of equity, assets, and invested capital. However, the company seems to be in a below average liquidity position and financial leverage is similar to others in the industry.
   3. The firm's days sales outstanding ratio is more than twice as long as the industry average, indicating that the firm should tighten credit or enforce a more stringent collection policy. The total assets turnover ratio is well below the industry average so sales should be increased, assets decreased, or both. While the company's profit margin is higher than the industry average, its other profitability ratios are low compared to the industry - net income should be higher given the amount of equity, assets, and invested capital. Finally, it's market value ratios are also below industry averages. However, the company seems to be in an average liquidity position and financial leverage is similar to others in the industry.
   4. The firm's days sales outstanding ratio is more than twice as long as the industry average, indicating that the firm should loosen credit or apply a less stringent collection policy. The total assets turnover ratio is well below the industry average so sales should be increased, assets increased, or both. While the company's profit margin is higher than the industry average, its other profitability ratios are low compared to the industry - net income should be higher given the amount of equity, assets, and invested capital. However, the company seems to be in an average liquidity position and financial leverage is similar to others in the industry.
   5. The firm's days sales outstanding ratio is less than the industry average, indicating that the firm should tighten credit or enforce a more stringent collection policy. The total assets turnover ratio is well below the industry average so sales should be increased, assets decreased, or both. While the company's profit margin is lower than the industry average, its other profitability ratios are high compared to the industry - net income should be higher given the amount of equity, assets, and invested capital. However, the company seems to be in an average liquidity position and financial leverage is similar to others in the industry.
4. Suppose Barry had doubled its sales as well as its inventories, accounts receivable, and common equity during 2018. How would that information affect the validity of your ratio analysis? (Hint: Think about averages and the effects of rapid growth on ratios if averages are not used. No calculations are needed.) Either I, II, III, IV, or V
   1. If 2018 represents a period of supernormal growth for the firm, ratios based on this year will be accurate and a comparison between them and industry averages will have substantial meaning. Potential investors need only look at 2018 ratios to be well informed, and a return to normal conditions in 2019 could help the firm's stock price.
   2. If 2018 represents a period of normal growth for the firm, ratios based on this year will be distorted and a comparison between them and industry averages will have little meaning. Potential investors who look only at 2018 ratios will be misled, and a continuation of normal conditions in 2019 could hurt the firm's stock price.
   3. If 2018 represents a period of normal growth for the firm, ratios based on this year will be accurate and a comparison between them and industry averages will have substantial meaning. Potential investors who look only at 2018 ratios will be misled, and a return to supernormal conditions in 2019 could hurt the firm's stock price.
   4. If 2018 represents a period of supernormal growth for the firm, ratios based on this year will be distorted and a comparison between them and industry averages will have substantial meaning. Potential investors who look only at 2018 ratios will be well informed, and a return to normal conditions in 2019 could hurt the firm's stock price.
   5. If 2018 represents a period of supernormal growth for the firm, ratios based on this year will be distorted and a comparison between them and industry averages will have little meaning. Potential investors who look only at 2018 ratios will be misled, and a return to normal conditions in 2019 could hurt the firm's stock price.