David and Daniel are on trial for burglary. It is alleged that they broke into an unoccupied house one night and stole money from a desk. David defense is alibi: he says he was at home in bed at the time of the offence and accused Daniel since he has conviction of four years ago, for burglary, when he broke into a shop and stole money from the safe. During the trial David attacked one of prosecution witness saying, 'a lying, low down brothel keeping whore and thief". David has the following convictions: 1. Two years ago, for five offences of fraud which involved him using a stolen credit card on five occasions to purchase items from shops. 2. Last year, for theft of a jumper from the local superstore 3. Last month, for possession of illegal drugs o Discuss whether the prosecution and David will be permitted to adduce evidence under Criminal Justice Act 2003 with supporting case laws elaborated