Question
Davis Kitchen Supply produces stoves for commercial kitchens. The costs to manufacture and market the stoves at the company's normal volume of 6,000 units per
Davis Kitchen Supply produces stoves for commercial kitchens. The costs to manufacture and market the stoves at the company's normal volume of 6,000 units per month are shown in the following table.
Unit manufacturing costs | ||||||
Variable materials | $ | 41 | ||||
Variable labor | 66 | |||||
Variable overhead | 16 | |||||
Fixed overhead | 51 | |||||
Total unit manufacturing costs | $ | 174 | ||||
Unit marketing costs | ||||||
Variable | 16 | |||||
Fixed | 61 | |||||
Total unit marketing costs | 77 | |||||
Total unit costs | $ | 251 | ||||
Unless otherwise stated, assume that no connection exists between the situation described in each question; each is independent. Unless otherwise stated, assume a regular selling price of $408 per unit. Ignore income taxes and other costs that are not mentioned in the table or in the question itself.
On March 1, the federal government offers Davis a contract to supply 1,000 units to military bases for a March 31 delivery. Because of an unusually large number of rush orders from its regular customers, Davis plans to produce 8,000 units during March, which will use all available capacity. If it accepts the government order, it would lose 1,000 units normally sold to regular customers to a competitor. The government contract would reimburse its "share of March manufacturing costs" plus pay a $59,000 fixed fee (profit). (No variable marketing costs would be incurred on the government's units.) Assuming that the government's "share of March manufacturing costs" will be the proportionate fixed manufacturing cost, what impact would accepting the government contract have on March income? (Select option "increase" or "decrease", keeping without government contract as the base. Select "none" if there is no effect.)
Davis Kitchen Supply produces stoves for commercial kitchens. The costs to manufacture and market the stoves at the company's normal volume of 6,000 units per month are shown in the following table.
Unit manufacturing costs | ||||||
Variable materials | $ | 41 | ||||
Variable labor | 66 | |||||
Variable overhead | 16 | |||||
Fixed overhead | 51 | |||||
Total unit manufacturing costs | $ | 174 | ||||
Unit marketing costs | ||||||
Variable | 16 | |||||
Fixed | 61 | |||||
Total unit marketing costs | 77 | |||||
Total unit costs | $ | 251 | ||||
Unless otherwise stated, assume that no connection exists between the situation described in each question; each is independent. Unless otherwise stated, assume a regular selling price of $408 per unit. Ignore income taxes and other costs that are not mentioned in the table or in the question itself.
On March 1, the federal government offers Davis a contract to supply 1,000 units to military bases for a March 31 delivery. Because of an unusually large number of rush orders from its regular customers, Davis plans to produce 8,000 units during March, which will use all available capacity. If it accepts the government order, it would lose 1,000 units normally sold to regular customers to a competitor. The government contract would reimburse its "share of March manufacturing costs" plus pay a $59,000 fixed fee (profit). (No variable marketing costs would be incurred on the government's units.) Assuming that the government's "share of March manufacturing costs" will be the proportionate fixed manufacturing cost, what impact would accepting the government contract have on March income? (Select option "increase" or "decrease", keeping without government contract as the base. Select "none" if there is no effect.)
Show less
|
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started