Dear CourseHero Team, I was assigned an assignment on how consequentialist/categorical moral reasoning play into the case of R v Dudley and Stephens 14 QBD 273. Specifically, if they are drawing lots, why no one would then hold out their own life as more significant than that of the others. Each takes an equal risk, which is what the court seemed to have a problem with, so the result might have changed. Please find the link for the case mentioned attached. http://www.e-lawresources.co.uk/cases/R-v-Dudley-and-Stephens.php Thank you in advance