decided to expand her bakery, so she made an offer to Sarah for Sarah to construct the expansion. They subsequently entered into a written contract on July 15. The contract stated that Sarah would start construction by September 1 and finish by November 15. The contract also stated that time was of the essence, because Imma had already contracted out with other suppliers to deliver additional bakery supplies to her bakery by November 15 so that Imma could provide more holiday bakery items. Thus, if the expansion of the bakery was not complete by November 15, Imma would lose a significant amount of money every single day until it was completed. On August 1, Sarah notified Imma that Sarah had taken on too many projects, and that Sarah would not be able to start work on the bakery expansion until September 20, and would not be able to finish until December 15. On August 20, without informing Sarah, Imma hired a new contractor to start and complete the project under the aforementioned contractual dates. On September 1, after readjusting her schedule so that she could start and finish on time, Sarah showed up to work on the expansion of the bakery. However, Imma refused to let Sarah work. If Imma brings a cause of action for breach of contract against Sarah, who will prevail? a) Imma, because Imma changed position in reliance on Sarah's anticipatory repudiation. b) Imma, because she was the party who made the original offer. c) Sarah, because she was ready, willing and able to tender performance on the contractually specified date and Imma wrongfully prevented Sarah's performance. d) Sarah, because she was not notified that another contractor had been hired by Imma to construct the expansion of the bakery