Defendant was observed standing on a street corner known as a prime location for drug transactions when he recognized a plainclothes police officer coming toward him. Defendant turned and ran in the opposite direction. The officer yelled freeze and gave chase. As he ran, the officer saw the defendant pull a plastic baggie from his pocket and throw it to the ground. The officer caught up with the defendant a block later and tackled the defendant to the ground. The officer place the defendant under arrest and after handcuffing defendant's hands behind his back, uncovered a concealed handgun during a search of the defendant during the chase, and recognized it as containing small glass vials of crack cocaine. Defendant is charged with firearms and narcotics possession offenses, and proceeds to trial.

Defendant's motion seeking suppression of the crack cocaine should

A) succeed because the officer lacked probable cause to arrest him

B) succeed because the officer lacked probably cause to chase him

C) succeed because the officer did not know about the crack at the time he arrested defendant

D) fail because the discovery of the crack was not a result of a 4th amendment search and seizure

Defendant's motion seeking suppression of the handgun should

A) succeed because the officer seized him when he tackled him to the ground

B) succeed because the officer failed to properly identify himself

C) fail because the gun presented a threat to public safety

D) fail because the officer had probable cause to suspect criminal activity under the circumstances