Defendant was stopped by police inside the parking garage underneath his apartment building and subsequently arrested for operating while intoxicated. Defendant filed a motion to suppress, arguing that his Fourth Amendment rights were violated because the officers's conduct occurred during a warrantless entry into a constitutionally protected areathe curtilage of his home. The trial court denied the motion to suppress, and the court of appeals affirmed. How do you think the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled and why?

Source:State v. Dumstrey, 2016 WI (Wis. Sup. Ct. 2016).