define what exactly the Living Constitution is. As with the concept of statutory interpretation above, there are different and opposing viewpoints on the idea of a Living Constitution; what are these different perspectives called and how would you define them? What are their attitudes towards the idea of a Living Constitution? How does each viewpoint consider legislative intent in their perspective(s)? How do they approach the problem of the need for interpretation when it comes to constitutional law? Please use the works that you have read from Justice Scalia (A Matter of Interpretation) and the responses of the different authors therein in your answer(s) to this question. To be a little more specific and help guide you, also please define what a textualist is (according to Justice Scalia).