Descriptive statistics and inThe following post hoc results were reported after a Kruskal-Wallis test resulted in an overall significance level of p = .014. What is the best interpretation of the post hoc results given alpha=0.05? (Don't forget to make the Bonferroni Correction for alpha. The Bonferroni corrected alpha will be equal to alpha/n where n is the number of post hoc tests) MWUposthocsferential statistics are so different that they should not be used simultaneously in a study