Descriptive Statistics Dependent Variable: How insecure is Katie? Picture Condition (1 = Callout Condition (1 = Called Unfiltered, 2 = Filtered) Out, 2 = Did Not Call Out) Mean Std. Deviation N Unfiltered Called Out 5.04 1.428 25 Did Not Call Out 5.08 1.077 25 Total 5.06 1.252 50 Filtered Called Out 4.88 1.453 25 Did Not Call Out 3.64 1.254 25 Total 4,26 1.482 50 Total Called Out 4.96 1.428 50 Did Not Call Out 4.36 1.367 50 Total 4.66 1.423 100 Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Dependent Variable: How insecure is Katie? Type Ill Sum Source of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Corrected Model 35.240# 3 11.747 6.826 Intercept 2171.560 2171.560 1261.923 000 Picture Condition 16.000 16.000 9.298 003 CalloutCondition 9.000 9.000 5.230 024 Picture Condition * 10.240 10.240 5.951 017 CalloutCondition Error 165.200 96 1.721 Total 2372.000 100 Corrected Total 200.440 992). Choose the correct interpretation of the Tests of Between Subjects Effects table: A. There are two significant main effects and one significant interaction B. There is one significant main effect, one non-significant main effect, and one non- significant interaction C. There is one significant main effect, one non-significant main effect, and one significant interaction D. There are no significant main effects and one significant interaction E. There are two significant main effects and one non-significant interaction3). Which of the following is the accurate APA format for writing out the Callout Condition main effect (Called-Out vs. No Callout) and the dependent variable? A. We ran a univariate ANOVA with Picture Condition (Filtered vs Unfiltered) and Callout Condition (Called-Out vs Did Not Call Out) as our two independent variables and participant ratings of "How insecure is Katie?" as the dependent variable. There was not a significant main effect for the Callout Condition, F(1, 96) = 5.23, p = .24. Participants thought Katie was equally insecure in the Called-Out condition (M = 4.96, SD = 1.43) and the Did Not Call Out condition (M = 4.36, SD = 1.37). This fails to support the idea that merely calling out a social media user for posting filtered pictures can lead people to see her as insecure. B. We ran a univariate ANOVA with Picture Condition (Filtered vs Unfiltered) and Callout Condition (Called-Out vs Did Not Call Out) as our two independent variables and participant ratings of "How insecure is Katie?" as the dependent variable. There was a significant main effect for the Callout Condition, F(1, 96) = 9.30, p = .003. Participants thought Katie was more insecure in the Called-Out condition (M = 4.96, SD = 1.43) than in the Did Not Call Out condition (M = 4.36, SD = 1.37). This supports the idea that merely calling out a social media user for posting filtered pictures can lead people to see her as insecure. C. We ran a univariate ANOVA with Picture Condition (Filtered vs Unfiltered) and Callout Condition (Called-Out vs Did Not Call Out) as our two independent variables and participant ratings of "How insecure is Katie?" as the dependent variable. There was a significant main effect for the Callout Condition, F(1, 96) = 5.23, p = .024. Participants thought Katie was more insecure in the Called-Out condition (M = 4.96, SD = 1.43) than in the Did Not Call Out condition (M = 4.36, SD = 1.37). This supports the idea that merely calling out a social media user for posting filtered pictures can lead people to see her as insecure.D. We ran a univariate ANOVA with Picture Condition (Filtered vs Unfiltered) and Callout Condition (Called-Out vs Did Not Call Out) as our two independent variables and participant ratings of "How insecure is Katie?" as the dependent variable. There was a significant main effect for the Callout Condition, F(1, 100) = 5.95, p = .017. Participants thought Katie was more insecure in the Called-Out condition (M = 4.96, SD = 1.43) than in the Did Not Call Out condition (M = 4.36, SD = 1.37). This supports the idea that merely calling out a social media user for posting filtered pictures can lead people to see her as insecure. E. We ran a univariate ANOVA with Picture Condition (Filtered vs Unfiltered) and Callout condition (Called-Out vs Did Not Call Out) as our two independent variables and participant ratings of "How insecure is Katie?" as the dependent variable. There was a significant main effect for the Callout Condition, F(1, 96) = 5.23, p = .024. Participants thought Katie was more insecure in the Did Not Call Out condition (M = 4.96, SD = 1.43) than in the Called-Out condition (M = 4.36, SD = 1.37). This is contrary to our predictions that merely calling out a social media user for posting filtered pictures can lead people to see her as insecure