Did learning more about the various canons of statutory interpretation change your view of the issue inBostock v. Clayton Countyregarding how to interpret "sex" in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act? Explain why or why not.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 states:

(a) Employer practices

It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer -

(1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual'srace, color, religion, sex, or national origin; or

(2) to limit, segregate, or classify his employees or applicants for employment in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee, because of such individual'srace, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Listen to the oral argument inBostock v. Clayton County, regarding whether employment discrimination based on "sex" under Title VII includes discrimination based on sexual orientation and/or gender identity, available athttps://www.supremecourt.gov