Dilbert offered to sell an 1889 silver dollar coin to Dunlop Collectors, Inc. Dunlop examined the coin and agreed to pay Dilbert $1,500 for it. Later, Dunlop asked a representative from the American Numismatic Society to examine the coin. The coin turned out to be counterfeit. No evidence existed to indicate fraud on Dilbert's part. Dunlop sued Dilbert for rescission and a return of the $1,500. Based on the facts as presented, should Dunlop be able to rescind the contract and get its money back? Explain