Discuss, analyze and debate your reasoning for the legal conclusions given by Circuit Judge Rovner in theBeller v. Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County, 703 F.3d 288 (7th Cir. 2012)

https://casetext.com/case/beller-v-health-hosp-corp-of-marion-cnty

-Do you agree that the 2003 amendment was a "clarification" and not a substantive change to the EMTALA regulation?

-Should the agency's denomination of the amendment be determinative?

-Why is the named defendant the "Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County" and not Wishard Hospital?

-Had the outcome here favored the plaintiffs, what would the next procedural steps have been and what would the likely outcome of the case be on its merits?