Question
Discuss delictual liability for pure economic loss with reference to relevant case law. IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN
Discuss delictual liability for pure economic loss with reference to relevant case law.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN
REPORTABLE
CASE NO: 3595/08
In the matter between:
HAINRO GROENEWALD Plaintiff
and
IRVIN & JOHNSON LIMITED First Defendant
MILLENIUM SECURITY Second Defendant
NICHOLAS JOHANNES EHLERS Third Defendant
and
MILLENIUM SECURITY Third Party
JUDGMENT DELIVERED ON 17 MAY 2017
GAMBLE J:
INTRODUCTION
[1] In this opposed application the plaintiff seeks leave to amend his particulars of claim in a trial which is pending before this court. The first defendant ("I & J") is a listed company which, inter alia, owns a mariculture facility at Danger Point Bay near Gansbaai in the Western Cape at which it cultivates abalone for commercial purposes. During 2005 it concluded a written contract with the second defendant ("Millennium") to supply security services to it at that facility.
[2] In his particulars of claim the plaintiff alleges that on 1 March 2005, while innocently swimming in the sea in the immediate vicinity of I & J's abalone facility, he was wrongfully and unlawfully assaulted by the third defendant ("Ehlers") who fired a number of live rounds at him with a firearm. The plaintiff claims that one such bullet struck him and that as a consequence thereof he suffered severe injuries to the head, and in particular the brain, which have left him permanently disabled with a number of serious sequelae.
[3] On 27 February 2008 the plaintiff issued summons out of this court claiming damages in the amount of R4, 18m for the injuries sustained in the shooting incident. The claim was brought against the three defendants jointly and severally on the basis of the following allegations in the particulars of claim:
"13.1 the Second Defendant is vicariously liable for the said delicts of the Third Defendant; and
13.2 the First Defendant is vicariously liable for the delicts of Second and/or Third Defendants."
[4] The defendants have resisted the claim with I & J represented by one set of attorneys and Millennium and Ehlers by a different firm. Both groups of defendants and the third party have filed their respective pleas to which brief reference will be made later.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started