Discussion Board Nine , Please reference the syllabus for the expectation required of a Discussion Board response. The response is not opinion but a substantiated analytical answer. Please respond specifically to the query and then to one peer for credit. Discussion Board closes at 11 p.m. on the DUE DATE. When you work through a discussion board activity, for full credit you must have a posting of your answer with a reference to where you obtained the information (your text is often the easiest, on-line research on the topic will enhance your answer and your grade) and you must post a second answer responding to a classmate with either a question or comment. "l agree" is not enough analysis for a second answer. You must back up your work with explanation or an outside source. Harry and Meghan Windsor were divorced after a short marriage and entered into an agreement to divide assets in Texas. The assets included their house, each of their cars, and retirement accounts. In addition to the division of personal property as agreed to and as recarded by the court, Meghan claimed ownership of a Nissan automaobile and one-half of a $50,000 certificate of deposit, insisting that they were both gifts from her former husband. Both the car, registered in Harry's name, and the certificate were purchased by Harry before the marriage. Harry denied having given the car and one- half interest in the certificate of deposit. Meghan also claimed possession of a diamond necklane in her possession, stating it was a gift from her mother. Harry claimed possession of a Charleville 1766 musket stating it was a family heirloom dating back to the American Revolutionary War. Discuss: 1) What is an inter vivos gift? Has the requirement been met per Meghan's claim to the disputed property? (Owen v. Owen, 351 N.W.2d 139 South Dakota) 2) Identify which personal property would go to whaom in this situation. 3) What will be declared in the community property? How will this be divided