Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Discussion Question 2-9 (LO. 1, 5) Sally Andrews calls you on the phone. She says that she has found a 2014 letter ruling that agrees

image text in transcribed

Discussion Question 2-9 (LO. 1, 5) Sally Andrews calls you on the phone. She says that she has found a 2014 letter ruling that agrees with a position she wants to take on her tax return. She asks you about the precedential value of a letter ruling. Indicate whether the following statements are "Correct" or "Incorrect" with regard to the precedential value of a letter ruling. A letter ruling is applicable only to the taxpayer it addresses. A letter ruling has no precedential authority over another taxpayer's situation. Letter rulings apply to all taxpayers with tax situations similar to the one the ruling addresses. Therefore, a letter ruling has precedential authority. Although a letter ruling is applicable only to the taxpayer it addresses, a ruling may be used as precedent for other taxpayers within the window of five years from the date the ruling was issued. Complete the accountant's memo below for the office files. TAX FILE MEMORANDUM September 24, 2020 FROM: George Ames SUBJECT: Telephone conversation with Sally Andrews on applicability of 2014 letter ruling I informed Sally Andrews that she rely on the 2014 letter ruling that was issued. I also stressed that a letter ruling precedential value under $ 6110(k)(3). I pointed out that a letter ruling indicates the position of the IRS on the specific fact pattern presented as of the date of the letter ruling. As such, a letter ruling is authority. However, under Notice 90-20, 1990-1 C.B. 328, a letter ruling substantial authority for purposes of the accuracy-related penalty in 5 6662. Discussion Question 2-9 (LO. 1, 5) Sally Andrews calls you on the phone. She says that she has found a 2014 letter ruling that agrees with a position she wants to take on her tax return. She asks you about the precedential value of a letter ruling. Indicate whether the following statements are "Correct" or "Incorrect" with regard to the precedential value of a letter ruling. A letter ruling is applicable only to the taxpayer it addresses. A letter ruling has no precedential authority over another taxpayer's situation. Letter rulings apply to all taxpayers with tax situations similar to the one the ruling addresses. Therefore, a letter ruling has precedential authority. Although a letter ruling is applicable only to the taxpayer it addresses, a ruling may be used as precedent for other taxpayers within the window of five years from the date the ruling was issued. Complete the accountant's memo below for the office files. TAX FILE MEMORANDUM September 24, 2020 FROM: George Ames SUBJECT: Telephone conversation with Sally Andrews on applicability of 2014 letter ruling I informed Sally Andrews that she rely on the 2014 letter ruling that was issued. I also stressed that a letter ruling precedential value under $ 6110(k)(3). I pointed out that a letter ruling indicates the position of the IRS on the specific fact pattern presented as of the date of the letter ruling. As such, a letter ruling is authority. However, under Notice 90-20, 1990-1 C.B. 328, a letter ruling substantial authority for purposes of the accuracy-related penalty in 5 6662

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Money, Banking, Financial Markets & Institutions

Authors: Michael Brandl

2nd Edition

1337904821, 9781337904827

More Books

Students also viewed these Finance questions

Question

4 Name four appraisal methods.

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

8 What problems can occur with appraisal?

Answered: 1 week ago