Discussion Question:In determining the Constitutionality of a law, should a Court consider a rumored motivation unstated by a legislature if the plaintiff in a case challenging that law didn't make the argument that motivation exists? In other words, do you think the court in Lochner should have directly considered the theory that New York was just trying to protect the competitiveness of domestic workers as its main intention rather than protecting the health/safety of workers? If the plaintiff (Lochner) didn't make that claim