Discussion Question:Would you change the way the Judiciary focuses their interpretation of the "Equal Protection" clauseon specific classifications?

-Second, let's look at the way the rights and classifications are prioritized.

Even if people agree that substantive due process made sense and that certain rights can be legitimately recognized by the courts, we may not agree that the courts should attempt to prioritize which ones are the most important. We also may not agree that the courts have actually done that with their existing hierarchy of rights (and classifications).

Should rights even be split into different categories according to which are more fundamental?Should the Judiciary be the branch to make those decisions?

Discussion Question:Is the Judiciary the proper branch to prioritize the rights that they have acknowledged through the "Due Process Clause?"