Dnly about 13% of all people can wiggle their ears. Is this percent higher for millionaires? [if the 391 millionaires surveyed, ill] could wiggle their ears. What can he concluded at the or = {1.10 level of significance? 3- Fur this studve WE shim-lid use b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: He: |:| [please enter a decimal] H1: |:| [Please enter a decimal] c. The test statistic = I:] [please show your answer to 3 decimal places.} d. The p-value = |:| {Please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) e. The p-value is or f. Based on this, we should the null hypothesis. g. Thus, the final conclusion is that C! The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly higher than 1356 at o: = D.1l], so there is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of millionaires who can wiggle their ears is higher than 13%. O The data suggest the populaton proportion is significantly higher than 1335 at o: = .1l}, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of millionaires who can wiggle their ears is higher than 13%. CI The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly higher than 13% at o: = Ili, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of millionaires who can wiggle their ears is equal to 1356