Do not answer these questions by use of unlocks;

With this in mind therefore, standard costs need to be reviewed regularly. Some argue that standards should be revised as soon as there are any changes in the basis upon which they are set. If an existing standard is not correctly set, the use of the incorrect standard is pointless. Others say that frequent changes to standard costs hamper motivation as the goal posts are always shifting. In addition the process is also a time consuming one although this last point could be sorted by use of computers. Minor changes in rates, prices and usage are frequently ignored for a time, but once the cumulative effect is felt, they need to be changed. All standard costs are revised together at regular, periodic intervals such as six or twelve months. Revision should only be done when changes of permanent and reasonably long-term nature occur but not in response to temporary blips in price or efficiency.

1. What is the implication of The Real Danger Testin achieving justice for the business law conflicts when transactions are not well verified?

2.help explain the actual bias relating to business law case and their interpretations

3.how and when is irrationality a case for concern in business law operations and efficiency

4.what is the meaning and in interpretation of the natural justice when handling business law cases?

5. To which bodies do the principles of natural justice apply?

6.raise concern for the application of the right to be heard as a party in business law dimensions

7 .when and why is prior notice one of the key milestones when aiming to achieve relevance in business law criteria?

8.Do a party in a business law application really need the disclosure of information? why and what is the implication of such?

9.what is the meaning of adjournment as a far as business law and its disciplines are concerned?

10.when is the cross examination applicable when dealing with business law principle as well as other laws?