Do rats take more time on average than hamsters to travel through a maze? The table below shows the times in seconds that the rats and hamsters took. Rats: 31, 23, 35, 30, 41, 33, 25, 17, 44 Hamsters: 17, 26, 21, 25, 9, 3, 41, 11, 26 Assume that both populations follow a normal distribution. What can be concluded at the a = 0.10 level of significance level of significance? For this study, we should use Select an answer a. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Ho: Select an answer Select an answer Select an answer ) (please enter a decimal) H1: Select an answer Select an answer @ Select an answer @(Please enter a decimal) b. The test statistic ? O = (please show your answer to 3 decimal places. ) c. The p-value = (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) d. The p-value is ? @ a e. Based on this, we should Select an answer @ the null hypothesis. f. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... The results are statistically significant at a = 0. 10, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean time to complete the maze for rats is more than the population mean time to complete the maze for hamsters. The results are statistically significant at a = 0.10, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean time to complete the maze for the nine rats is more than the mean time to complete the maze for the nine hamsters. The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.10, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean time to complete the maze for rats is more than the population mean time to complete the maze for hamsters