Do you agree or disagree with what was said in the following posts? Explain

Post 1

Should autonomous vehicles be legalized for public use?

According to the factsheet presented by the University of Michigan's Center for Sustainable Systems, Autonomous vehicles are automobiles that move or navigate in the direction it should be going, either with a human fully or replace a human fully. Using technology, these vehicles run on their own or partially in order to get to the final destination ( www.css.umich.edu, 2023). Autonomous vehicles should not be legalized for public use. Although technology helps with advancement, the ability for it to fail can be detrimental. So I do believe it should only be used in control environments, and not for public use.

Should companies use automobile customer data for personalized advertising?

If it is legal, companies can use the data from the automobile for advertising. Data, once the consumer gives permission, can be helpful in narrowing down what the user really desires. It is a great tool to have to meet the needs of the consumer. Data should only be used if the consumer agrees. Certain data allows for companies to be given more access to consumers than they should have, which creates an uncomfortable space for privacy.

Should the law restrict the use of drones for surveillance?

The law should restrict the use of drones for surveillance. Drones are now being used to spy without permission. Military forces, using it to protect the land, should be the only ones to use drones for surveillance. Law enforcement should also be the only ones able to use drones. They have a great ability in the digital world to reduce labor costs in environments such as movies. They create dynamic that allows the viewers to have front-and-center visuals. However, the restriction should be limited indeed.

Post 2

Should autonomous vehicles be legalized for public use?

This is a very interesting and complex question. There are many possible advantages and disadvantages of autonomous vehicles. Autonomous vehicles could potentially reduce the number of accidents, fatalities, and injuries on the road, as they would not be affected by human factors such as fatigue, distraction, emotion, or intoxication. On the contrary, However, autonomous vehicles also pose some significant challenges and risks, such as the high cost of research and development, the lack of maturity and reliability of the technology, the possibility of technical errors or cyberattacks, the ethical and legal dilemmas of assigning responsibility and liability in case of accidents, and the social and environmental impacts of increased vehicle ownership and usage. It is all about perception.

Should companies use automobile customer data for personalized advertising?

Debates surround the utilization of automobile customer data in personalized advertising. Opposing views question its invasion of privacy versus its potential benefits for both companies and consumers. Recent insights from IBM Watson Advertising highlight technological advancements that offer solutions for automotive industry challenges. AI-driven tools can extract untapped data, providing actionable insights to comprehend customer intent and optimize engagement strategies. Nevertheless, ethical, and transparent use of customer data remains crucial. Consumers deserve clarity regarding data usage and the ability to opt out if desired. Companies must prioritize compliance with data protection laws. Upholding ethical standards while leveraging data capabilities stands pivotal in navigating the balance between personalized marketing and consumer privacy.

Should the use of drones for surveillance be restricted by law?

The utilization of drones in surveillance has sparked a multifaceted debate in recent times. While these devices serve various advantageous purposes like aiding in search and rescue missions, wildlife monitoring, and crop management, their potential for invasive surveillance is a concern. The use of drones for surveillance has raised concerns about privacy and property rights.The ACLU has underscored the risk of potential technology misuse leading to a surveillance-dominated state. In the absence of responsible and ethical regulation, law enforcement agencies might employ drones for surveillance, potentially inducing a chilling atmosphere in public areas and enabling discriminatory targeting.