The Parol Evidence Rule prevents parties from introducing evidence of other issues when a contract is seen as representing the entire agreement. There are a few exceptions. One is that the parties can present intent when there are ambiguous terms in the contract. How would you go about ensuring that there is no ambiguity in a contract?

In your initial post, discuss what you would do to avoid ambiguity. Respond to two peers and comment as to whether your position or your peers' ideas were correct. It may be that both are correct and you will need to explain why.