Do you think that criminal trials are the best way to fight terrorist organizations? If yes, is an international or domestic court better equipped to achieve such goals?

Do you think that the cross-examination by a crown attorney and the public display of the crimes committed would be enough to delegitimize terrorists in the eyes of public opinion? Do you find it reductive to portray a terrorist as a fanatic, hopelessly helpless in front of a logical argument? Do you think that this categorization enhances or reduces the chances for the international community to defeat international terrorism?