1. Do you think the Administrative Procedure Act is sufficient to make sure that federal agencies comply with Congress' intention in passing a federal law?
2. Do you think that the Administrative Procedure Act overly constrains federal agencies and can prevent them from enacting the laws Congress intended?
3. Why should there be strict liability? Is it fair to hold parties accountable for harms they did not intend and could not prevent?
4. Are courts and juries well-situated to determine when someone has acted negligently? If not, what would help them do so?
5. Most tort law in the United States has a "no harm, no foul" rule, so if there are no compensable damages, there is no cause of action to be heard by a court of law. Do you think this is a fair rule? How do you think damages should be determined?