Do you think the court should consider how changing social norms and practices affect citizens when deciding cases? If so, how should the court decide when a social norm or practice has changed? What measurements/ evidence should it rely on? What if a changing norm creates less liberty for a group? If the courts have acknowledged a "right" like same-sex marriage, should the same court be able to change its mind and rescind that right? There may be parts of Silver or Klarman that you want to refer to in this part of your response, or not. You could also go back to one of our earlier cases for your post. 2. When we don't, as a country, have a unified opinion about an issue like segregation or gun control or LGBTQ rights, how should policy around these issues be created? Who--or what branch of government--should be the creator of policy that affects the entire country