do you think the IAT is an accurate measurement of your bias for that category?

1. What is the issue? (Fairly summarize this week's discussion topic) 2. What are the main viewpoints? (Try your best to summarize the different viewpoints with as little bias as possible) 3. During our in-class meeting discussion for this topic, what do you feel were the most compelling arguments for each side of the issue? (These can be made by myself, or your peers) 4. Do the arguments (for each side) tend to pass the CARP/CRAP test? Why or why not? -Answer this question separately for each side

5. What is your own stance on the issue, and why do you have this stance? 6. Why do you believe the opposing stance is NOT correct? 7. Where do beliefs in this topic originate from? (Are they based on reliable, peer- reviewed scientific literature that you have read? Are they based on the opinions of others? Are you believing the same as your parents because that's what you were taught?) 8. What biases do you have with respect to this issue? (We ALL have bias. What's yours?) 9. How could someone change your mind on this issue? (What information would someone have to present to you in order to change your stance on this issue? Do NOT say, "You can't" or "Nothing.") 10. Devil's Advocate: compelling argument in favor of the stance opposite your own. (Note, this does not mean simply writing a statement opposite your own belief. It means challenging yourself to put yourself in someone else's position and really think about the logic THEY have).