Does memory performance differ based on study format (word, picture, and auditory study styles) and/or test format (in person vs. online)? Students in a class
Does memory performance differ based on study format (word, picture, and auditory study styles) and/or test format (in person vs. online)? Students in a class (N = 36) were randomly assigned to one of three study conditions (studying lists of words, pictures, or by listening to the list), and randomly assigned to one of two test types (in person or online). This means there were different people in each of the six conditions (n = 6 per condition): word study / in-person test; word study / online test; picture study / in-person test; picture study / online test; auditory study / in-person test; auditory study / online test. Data shown below are percent correct for each of these conditions. Enter it into SPSS to conduct the appropriate analysis and answer the following questions.
STUDY CONDITION
Word STUDY
Picture STUDY
Auditory STUDY
TEST TYPE
In-person TEST
88
79
68
80
90
92
90
85
50
85
74
74
67
78
54
78
89
79
Online TEST
56
70
92
78
45
71
62
65
88
95
51
89
59
67
87
90
67
93
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: MEASURE_1 Type Ill Sum Partial Eta Source of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Squared Study_Type Sphericity Assumed 164.056 2 82.028 .228 798 .022 Greenhouse-Geisser 164.056 1.110 147.816 .228 667 022 Huynh-Feldt 164.056 1.273 128.860 .228 .699 .022 Lower-bound 164.056 1.000 164.056 228 .643 022 Study_Type * Test_Type Sphericity Assumed 828.167 2 414.083 1.151 .337 .103 Greenhouse-Geisser 828.167 1.110 746.189 1.151 314 .103 Huynh-Feldt 828.167 1.273 650.494 1.151 320 .103 Lower-bound 828.167 1.000 828.167 1.151 .309 103 Error(Study_Type) Sphericity Assumed 7197.778 20 359.889 Greenhouse-Geisser 7197.778 11.099 648.529 Huynh-Feldt 7197.778 12.731 565.359 Lower-bound 7197.778 10.000 719.778Mauchly's Test of Sphericity Measure: MEASURE_1 Epsilon Approx. Chi- Greenhouse- Within Subjects Effect Mauchly's W Square df Sig. Geisser Huynh-Feldt Lower-bound Study_Type .198 14.577 2 <.001 .555 .637 .500 tests the null hypothesis that error covariance matrix of orthonormalized transformed dependent variables is proportional to an identity matrix. a. design: intercept test_type within subjects study_type b. may be used adjust degrees freedom for averaged significance. corrected are displayed in within-subjects effects table.descriptive statistics mean std. deviation n word person online total picture aditory>
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access with AI-Powered Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance