Question
Doing a digital signature with RSA alone on a long message, m, would be too slow (presumably using cipher block chaining). Suppose we could do
Doing a digital signature with RSA alone on a long message, m, would be too slow (presumably using cipher block chaining). Suppose we could do division quickly. Would it be reasonable to compute an RSA based digital signature on a long message by first finding what the message equals, mod n, and then sign the result of the message division mod n? Your response needs to include a justification with citations. (Hint: Is signing (m mod n) as secure as signing (m))Doing a digital signature with RSA alone on a long message, m, would be too slow (presumably using cipher block chaining). Suppose we could do division quickly. Would it be reasonable to compute an RSA based digital signature on a long message by first finding what the message equals, mod n, and then sign the result of the message division mod n? Your response needs to include a justification with citations. (Hint: Is signing (m mod n) as secure as signing (m))
This is network question please dont copy other answers
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started