Doug and Bill Tremblett were brothers and, at least in the early stages, owned a fishing boat together.The brothers worked together in the fishing operation from 1989 to 2004 using a crab license that Bill had acquired through a swap and that was held in his own name.The crab fishing license was the primary asset of the business and the main subject matter of the dispute.After the brothers stopped working together Bill continued on with the fishing enterprise, relying on the crab license he had obtained.

Explain any claim Doug might have against Bill in this situation.Would it affect your answer if Bill did more than Doug?If the value of the license was over $800,000 at the time they stopped fishing together, what would Doug be entitled to if successful given the trial took place in 2012?