Doug runs a fireworks company, and thus needs to store numerous explosive chemicals. He stores them in an abandoned mine on the side of a mountain that is $35$ miles away from any populated area. If Doug's chemicals accidentally explode and someone who was injured tried to hold him strictly liable, which of the following would be a potentially successful defense that Doug could assert?

That since his explosives were stored so far away from any populated area, there was no foreseeable risk of physical harm.

That storing explosives is an activity of common usage.

Strict liability does not exist under U$.$S$.$ law.

That Doug used the best available methods for storing the explosives safely.