download the attachment containing questions..........................................................................................................................................................................................................

P2 - Performance Management 24 November 2010 - Wednesday Afternoon Session Instructions to candidates You are allowed three hours to answer this question paper. You are allowed 20 minutes reading time before the examination begins during which you should read the question paper and, if you wish, make annotations on the question paper. However, you will not be allowed, under any circumstances, to open the answer book and start writing or use your calculator during this reading time. You are strongly advised to carefully read ALL the question requirements before attempting the question concerned (that is all parts and/or subquestions). ALL answers must be written in the answer book. Answers written on the question paper will not be submitted for marking. You should show all workings as marks are available for the method you use. ALL QUESTIONS ARE COMPULSORY. Section A comprises 5 questions and is on pages 2 to 6. Section B comprises 2 questions and is on pages 8 to 11. Maths tables and formulae are provided on pages 13 to 16. The list of verbs as published in the syllabus is given for reference on page 19. Write your candidate number, the paper number and examination subject title in the spaces provided on the front of the answer book. Also write your contact ID and name in the space provided in the right hand margin and seal to close. Tick the appropriate boxes on the front of the answer book to indicate which questions you have answered. P2 - Performance Management Performance Pillar TURN OVER The Chartered Institute of Management Accountants 2010 SECTION A - 50 MARKS [You are advised to spend no longer than 18 minutes on each question in this section.] ANSWER ALL FIVE QUESTIONS IN THIS SECTION. EACH QUESTION IS WORTH 10 MARKS. YOU SHOULD SHOW YOUR WORKINGS AS MARKS ARE AVAILABLE FOR THE METHOD YOU USE. Question One The following variances have been calculated in respect of a new product: Direct labour efficiency variance Direct labour rate variance $14,700 Favourable $ 5,250 Adverse The variances were calculated using standard cost data which showed that each unit of the product was expected to take 8 hours to produce at a cost of $15 per hour. Actual output of the product was 560 units and actual time worked in the manufacture of the product totalled 3,500 hours at a cost of $57,750. However, the production manager now realises that the standard time of 8 hours per unit was the time taken to produce the first unit and that a learning rate of 90% should have been anticipated for the first 600 units. Required: (a) Calculate planning and operating variances following the recognition of the learning curve effect. (6 marks) (b) Explain the importance of learning curves in the context of Target Costing. (4 marks) Note: The learning index for a 90% learning curve is -0.1520 (Total for Question One = 10 marks) Performance Management 2 November 2010 Question Two CAL manufactures and sells solar panels for garden lights. Components are bought in and assembled into metal frames that are machine manufactured by CAL. There are a number of alternative suppliers of these solar panels. Some of CAL's competitors charge a lower price, but supply lower quality panels; whereas others supply higher quality panels than CAL but for a much higher price. CAL is preparing its budgets for the coming year and has estimated that the market demand for its type of solar panels will be 100,000 units and that its share will be 20,000 units (i.e. 20% of the available market). The standard cost details of each solar panel are as follows: Selling price Bought - in components (1 set) Assembly & machining cost Delivery cost Contribution $ per unit 60 15 25 5 45 15 An analysis of CAL's recent performance revealed that 2% of the solar panels supplied to customers were returned for free replacement, because the customer found that they were faulty. Investigation of these returned items shows that the components had been damaged when they had been assembled into the metal frame. These returned panels cannot be repaired and have no scrap value. If the supply of faulty solar panels to customers could be eliminated then, due to improved customer perception, CAL's market share would increase to 25%. Required: (a) Explain, with reference to CAL, quality conformance costs and quality nonconformance costs and the relationship between them. (4 marks) (b) Assuming that CAL continues with its present systems and that the percentage of quality failings is as stated above: (i) Calculate, based on the budgeted figures and sales returns rate, the total relevant costs of quality for the coming year. (4 marks) (ii) Calculate the maximum saving that could be made by implementing an inspection process for the solar panels, immediately before the goods are delivered. (2 marks) (Total for Question Two = 10 marks) Section A continues on page 4 TURN OVER November 2010 3 Performance Management Question Three QW is a company that manufactures machine parts from sheet metal to specific customer order for industrial customers. QW is considering diversification into the production of metal ornaments. The ornaments would be produced at a constant rate throughout the year. It then plans to sell these ornaments from inventory through wholesalers and via direct mail to consumers. Presently, each of the machine parts is specific to a customer's order. Consequently, the company does not hold an inventory of finished items but it does hold the equivalent of one day's production of sheet metal so as to reduce the risk of being unable to produce goods demanded by customers at short notice. There is a one day lead time for delivery of sheet metal to QW from its main supplier though additional supplies could be obtained at less competitive prices. Demand for these industrial goods is such that delivery is required almost immediately after the receipt of the customer order. QW is aware that if it is unable to meet an order immediately the industrial customer would seek an alternative supplier, despite QW having a reputation for high quality machine parts. The management of QW is not aware of the implications of the diversification for its production and inventory policies. Required (a) Compare and contrast QW's present production and inventory policy and practices with a traditional production system that uses constant production levels and holds inventory to meet peaks of demand. (5 marks) (b) Discuss the importance of a Total Quality Management (TQM) system in a just-in-time (JIT) environment. Use QW to illustrate your discussion. (5 marks) (Total for Question Three = 10 marks) Performance Management 4 November 2010 Question Four DW, a transport company, operates three depots. Each depot has a manager who reports directly to the Operations Director. For many years the depot managers have been asked by the Operations Director to prepare a budget for their depot as part of the company's annual budgeting process. A new depot manager has been appointed to the Southern region and he has concerns about the validity of these annual budgets. He argues that they soon become out of date as operational circumstances change. At a recent manager's meeting he said, \"They are restrictive. They do not permit the depot managers to make decisions in response to operational changes, or change working practices for next year until that year's budget has been approved.\" Required: (a) Explain the differences between the above annual budgeting system and a rolling budget system. (4 marks) (b) Discuss how the Southern region depot manager could use a rolling budget system to address his concerns. (6 marks) (Total for Question Four = 10 marks) Section A continues on page 6 TURN OVER November 2010 5 Performance Management Question Five XY provides accountancy services and has three different categories of client: limited companies, self employed individuals, and employed individuals requiring taxation advice. XY currently charges its clients a fee by adding a 20% mark-up to total costs. Currently the costs are attributed to each client based on the hours spent on preparing accounts and providing advice. XY is considering changing to an activity based costing system. The annual costs and the causes of these costs have been analysed as follows: $ 580,000 30,000 15,000 60,000 40,000 Accounts preparation and advice Requesting missing information Issuing fee payment reminders Holding client meetings Travelling to clients The following details relate to three of XY's clients and to XY as a whole: Hours spent on preparing accounts and providing advice Requests for missing information Payment reminders sent Client meetings held Miles travelled to meet clients A Client B C 1,000 4 2 4 150 250 10 8 1 600 340 6 10 2 0 XY 18,000 250 400 250 10,000 Required: Prepare calculations to show the effect on fees charged to each of these three clients of changing to the new costing system. (10 marks) (Total for Question Five = 10 marks) (Total for Section A = 50 marks) End of Section A Section B starts on page 8 Performance Management 6 November 2010 This page is blank TURN OVER November 2010 7 Performance Management SECTION B - 50 MARKS [You are advised to spend no longer than 45 minutes on each question in this section.] ANSWER BOTH QUESTIONS IN THIS SECTION. EACH QUESTION IS WORTH 25 MARKS. YOU SHOULD SHOW YOUR WORKINGS AS MARKS ARE AVAILABLE FOR THE METHOD YOU USE. Question Six LM produces two products from different quantities of the same resources using a just-in-time (JIT) production system. The selling price and resource requirements of each of these two products are as follows: Product Unit selling price ($) L 70 M 90 Variable costs per unit: Direct labour ($7 per hour) Direct material ($5 per kg) Machine hours ($10 per hour) 28 10 10 14 45 20 Fixed overheads absorbed 12 6 Profit per unit 10 5 Fixed overheads are absorbed at the rate of $3 per direct labour hour. Market research shows that the maximum demand for products L and M during December 2010 will be 400 units and 700 units respectively. At a recent meeting of the purchasing and production managers to discuss the company's production plans for December 2010, the following resource availability for December 2010 was identified: Direct labour Direct material Machine hours 3,500 hours 6,000 kg 2,000 hours Required: (a) Prepare calculations to show, from a financial perspective, the optimum production plan for December 2010 and the contribution that would result from adopting your plan. (6 marks) Performance Management 8 November 2010 (b) You have now presented your optimum plan to the purchasing and production managers of LM. During the presentation, the following additional information became available: (i) The company has agreed to an order for 250 units of product M for a selling price of $90 per unit from a new overseas customer. This order is in addition to the maximum demand that was previously predicted and must be produced and delivered in December 2010; (ii) The originally predicted resource restrictions were optimistic. The managers now agree that the availability of all resources will be 20% lower than their original predictions. Required: Construct the revised resource constraints and the objective function to be used to identify, given the additional information above, the revised optimum production plan for December 2010. (6 marks) (c) The resource constraints and objective function requested in part (b) above have now been processed in a simplex linear programming model and the following solution has been printed: Product L Product M Direct labour Direct material ($) Machine hours Contribution ($) 400 194 312 1.22 312 10,934.00 Product L other value Product M other value 0 506 Required: Analyse the meaning of each of the above eight values in the solution to the problem. Your answer should include a proof of the five individual values highlighted in bold. (13 marks) (Total for Question Six = 25 marks) Section B continues on page 10 TURN OVER November 2010 9 Performance Management Question Seven SWZ is a manufacturing company that has many trading divisions. Return on Investment (ROI) is the main measure of each division's performance. Each divisional manager's salary is linked only to their division's ROI. The following information summarises the financial performance of the S division of SWZ over the last three years: Year ending 31 October Turnover Cost of sales Gross profit Other operating costs Pre-tax operating profit 2008 $000 400 240 160 120 40 2009 $000 400 240 160 104 56 2010 $000 400 240 160 98 62 Capital invested as at the end of the year 400 320 256 Other operating costs include asset depreciation calculated at the rate of 20% per annum on a reducing balance basis. The figures shown in the above table for the capital invested as at the end of the year is the net book value of the division's fixed assets. All of the above values have been adjusted to remove the effects of inflation. There have been no additions or disposals of fixed assets within the S division during this period. Required (a) Discuss the performance of the S division over the three year period. (9 marks) Performance Management 10 November 2010 The manager of the S division is now considering investing in a replacement machine. The machine that would be replaced would be sold for its net book value which was $40,000 at 31 October 2010 and the new machine would cost $100,000. The new machine would have an expected life of five years and would be depreciated using the same depreciation rates as the existing machinery. The new machine would reduce the division's cost of sales by 10%. At the end of five years it would be sold for its net book value. The divisional cost of capital is 8% per annum. The company has evaluated the investment and correctly determined that it has a positive Net Present Value (NPV) of $24,536. Required (b) Prepare calculations to show why the manager of the S division is unlikely to go ahead with the investment. Ignore taxation. (11 marks) (c) Prepare calculations to show how the use of Residual Income (RI) as the performance measure would have led to a goal congruent decision by the manager of the S division in relation to the purchase of the replacement machine. Ignore taxation. (5 marks) (Total for Question Seven = 25 marks) (Total for Section B = 50 marks) End of question paper November 2010 11 Performance Management Maths tables and formulae are on pages 13 to 16 Performance Management 12 November 2010 PRESENT VALUE TABLE ( Present value of 1 unit of currency, that is 1+ r periods until payment or receipt. )n where r = interest rate; n = number of Periods (n) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 1% 0.990 0.980 0.971 0.961 0.951 0.942 0.933 0.923 0.914 0.905 0.896 0.887 0.879 0.870 0.861 0.853 0.844 0.836 0.828 0.820 2% 0.980 0.961 0.942 0.924 0.906 0.888 0.871 0.853 0.837 0.820 0.804 0.788 0.773 0.758 0.743 0.728 0.714 0.700 0.686 0.673 3% 0.971 0.943 0.915 0.888 0.863 0.837 0.813 0.789 0.766 0.744 0.722 0.701 0.681 0.661 0.642 0.623 0.605 0.587 0.570 0.554 4% 0.962 0.925 0.889 0.855 0.822 0.790 0.760 0.731 0.703 0.676 0.650 0.625 0.601 0.577 0.555 0.534 0.513 0.494 0.475 0.456 Interest rates (r) 5% 6% 0.952 0.943 0.907 0.890 0.864 0.840 0.823 0.792 0.784 0.747 0.746 0705 0.711 0.665 0.677 0.627 0.645 0.592 0.614 0.558 0.585 0.527 0.557 0.497 0.530 0.469 0.505 0.442 0.481 0.417 0.458 0.394 0.436 0.371 0.416 0.350 0.396 0.331 0.377 0.312 7% 0.935 0.873 0.816 0.763 0.713 0.666 0.623 0.582 0.544 0.508 0.475 0.444 0.415 0.388 0.362 0.339 0.317 0.296 0.277 0.258 8% 0.926 0.857 0.794 0.735 0.681 0.630 0.583 0.540 0.500 0.463 0.429 0.397 0.368 0.340 0.315 0.292 0.270 0.250 0.232 0.215 9% 0.917 0.842 0.772 0.708 0.650 0.596 0.547 0.502 0.460 0.422 0.388 0.356 0.326 0.299 0.275 0.252 0.231 0.212 0.194 0.178 10% 0.909 0.826 0.751 0.683 0.621 0.564 0.513 0.467 0.424 0.386 0.350 0.319 0.290 0.263 0.239 0.218 0.198 0.180 0.164 0.149 Periods (n) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11% 0.901 0.812 0.731 0.659 0.593 0.535 0.482 0.434 0.391 0.352 0.317 0.286 0.258 0.232 0.209 0.188 0.170 0.153 0.138 0.124 12% 0.893 0.797 0.712 0.636 0.567 0.507 0.452 0.404 0.361 0.322 0.287 0.257 0.229 0.205 0.183 0.163 0.146 0.130 0.116 0.104 13% 0.885 0.783 0.693 0.613 0.543 0.480 0.425 0.376 0.333 0.295 0.261 0.231 0.204 0.181 0.160 0.141 0.125 0.111 0.098 0.087 14% 0.877 0.769 0.675 0.592 0.519 0.456 0.400 0.351 0.308 0.270 0.237 0.208 0.182 0.160 0.140 0.123 0.108 0.095 0.083 0.073 Interest rates (r) 15% 16% 0.870 0.862 0.756 0.743 0.658 0.641 0.572 0.552 0.497 0.476 0.432 0.410 0.376 0.354 0.327 0.305 0.284 0.263 0.247 0.227 0.215 0.195 0.187 0.168 0.163 0.145 0.141 0.125 0.123 0.108 0.107 0.093 0.093 0.080 0.081 0.069 0.070 0.060 0.061 0.051 17% 0.855 0.731 0.624 0.534 0.456 0.390 0.333 0.285 0.243 0.208 0.178 0.152 0.130 0.111 0.095 0.081 0.069 0.059 0.051 0.043 18% 0.847 0.718 0.609 0.516 0.437 0.370 0.314 0.266 0.225 0.191 0.162 0.137 0.116 0.099 0.084 0.071 0.060 0.051 0.043 0.037 19% 0.840 0.706 0.593 0.499 0.419 0.352 0.296 0.249 0.209 0.176 0.148 0.124 0.104 0.088 0.079 0.062 0.052 0.044 0.037 0.031 20% 0.833 0.694 0.579 0.482 0.402 0.335 0.279 0.233 0.194 0.162 0.135 0.112 0.093 0.078 0.065 0.054 0.045 0.038 0.031 0.026 November 2010 13 Performance Management Cumulative present value of 1 unit of currency per annum, Receivable or Payable at the end of each year for n years Periods (n) 1 2 3 4 5 1 (1+ r ) n r 1% 0.990 1.970 2.941 3.902 4.853 2% 0.980 1.942 2.884 3.808 4.713 3% 0.971 1.913 2.829 3.717 4.580 4% 0.962 1.886 2.775 3.630 4.452 Interest rates (r) 5% 6% 0.952 0.943 1.859 1.833 2.723 2.673 3.546 3.465 4.329 4.212 7% 0.935 1.808 2.624 3.387 4.100 8% 0.926 1.783 2.577 3.312 3.993 9% 0.917 1.759 2.531 3.240 3.890 10% 0.909 1.736 2.487 3.170 3.791 6 7 8 9 10 5.795 6.728 7.652 8.566 9.471 5.601 6.472 7.325 8.162 8.983 5.417 6.230 7.020 7.786 8.530 5.242 6.002 6.733 7.435 8.111 5.076 5.786 6.463 7.108 7.722 4.917 5.582 6.210 6.802 7.360 4.767 5.389 5.971 6.515 7.024 4.623 5.206 5.747 6.247 6.710 4.486 5.033 5.535 5.995 6.418 4.355 4.868 5.335 5.759 6.145 11 12 13 14 15 10.368 11.255 12.134 13.004 13.865 9.787 10.575 11.348 12.106 12.849 9.253 9.954 10.635 11.296 11.938 8.760 9.385 9.986 10.563 11.118 8.306 8.863 9.394 9.899 10.380 7.887 8.384 8.853 9.295 9.712 7.499 7.943 8.358 8.745 9.108 7.139 7.536 7.904 8.244 8.559 6.805 7.161 7.487 7.786 8.061 6.495 6.814 7.103 7.367 7.606 16 17 18 19 20 14.718 15.562 16.398 17.226 18.046 13.578 14.292 14.992 15.679 16.351 12.561 13.166 13.754 14.324 14.878 11.652 12.166 12.659 13.134 13.590 10.838 11.274 11.690 12.085 12.462 10.106 10.477 10.828 11.158 11.470 9.447 9.763 10.059 10.336 10.594 8.851 9.122 9.372 9.604 9.818 8.313 8.544 8.756 8.950 9.129 7.824 8.022 8.201 8.365 8.514 Periods (n) 1 2 3 4 5 11% 0.901 1.713 2.444 3.102 3.696 12% 0.893 1.690 2.402 3.037 3.605 13% 0.885 1.668 2.361 2.974 3.517 14% 0.877 1.647 2.322 2.914 3.433 Interest rates (r) 15% 16% 0.870 0.862 1.626 1.605 2.283 2.246 2.855 2.798 3.352 3.274 17% 0.855 1.585 2.210 2.743 3.199 18% 0.847 1.566 2.174 2.690 3.127 19% 0.840 1.547 2.140 2.639 3.058 20% 0.833 1.528 2.106 2.589 2.991 6 7 8 9 10 4.231 4.712 5.146 5.537 5.889 4.111 4.564 4.968 5.328 5.650 3.998 4.423 4.799 5.132 5.426 3.889 4.288 4.639 4.946 5.216 3.784 4.160 4.487 4.772 5.019 3.685 4.039 4.344 4.607 4.833 3.589 3.922 4.207 4.451 4.659 3.498 3.812 4.078 4.303 4.494 3.410 3.706 3.954 4.163 4.339 3.326 3.605 3.837 4.031 4.192 11 12 13 14 15 6.207 6.492 6.750 6.982 7.191 5.938 6.194 6.424 6.628 6.811 5.687 5.918 6.122 6.302 6.462 5.453 5.660 5.842 6.002 6.142 5.234 5.421 5.583 5.724 5.847 5.029 5.197 5.342 5.468 5.575 4.836 4.988 5.118 5.229 5.324 4.656 7.793 4.910 5.008 5.092 4.486 4.611 4.715 4.802 4.876 4.327 4.439 4.533 4.611 4.675 16 17 18 19 20 7.379 7.549 7.702 7.839 7.963 6.974 7.120 7.250 7.366 7.469 6.604 6.729 6.840 6.938 7.025 6.265 6.373 6.467 6.550 6.623 5.954 6.047 6.128 6.198 6.259 5.668 5.749 5.818 5.877 5.929 5.405 5.475 5.534 5.584 5.628 5.162 5.222 5.273 5.316 5.353 4.938 4.990 5.033 5.070 5.101 4.730 4.775 4.812 4.843 4.870 Performance Management 14 November 2010 FORMULAE PROBABILITY A B = A or B. A B = A and B (overlap). P(B | A) = probability of B, given A. Rules of Addition If A and B are mutually exclusive: If A and B are not mutually exclusive: P(A B) = P(A) + P(B) P(A B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A B) Rules of Multiplication If A and B are independent: If A and B are not independent: P(A B) = P(A) * P(B) P(A B) = P(A) * P(B | A) E(X) = (probability * payoff) DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS Arithmetic Mean x = x n x= fx f (frequency distribution) Standard Deviation SD = ( x x ) 2 n SD = fx 2 x 2 (frequency distribution) f INDEX NUMBERS Price relative = 100 * P1/P0 Price: Quantity: Quantity relative = 100 * Q1/Q0 P w 1 Po w x 100 Q w 1 Qo x 100 w TIME SERIES Additive Model Series = Trend + Seasonal + Random Multiplicative Model Series = Trend * Seasonal * Random November 2010 15 Performance Management FINANCIAL MATHEMATICS Compound Interest (Values and Sums) Future Value S, of a sum of X, invested for n periods, compounded at r% interest n S = X[1 + r] Annuity Present value of an annuity of 1 per annum receivable or payable for n years, commencing in one year, discounted at r% per annum: PV = 1 1 1 r [1 + r ] n Perpetuity Present value of 1 per annum, payable or receivable in perpetuity, commencing in one year, discounted at r% per annum: PV = 1 r LEARNING CURVE b Yx = aX where: Yx = the cumulative average time per unit to produce X units; a = the time required to produce the first unit of output; X = the cumulative number of units; b = the index of learning. The exponent b is defined as the log of the learning curve improvement rate divided by log 2. INVENTORY MANAGEMENT Economic Order Quantity 2C o D EOQ = Ch where: Co Ch D = = = cost of placing an order cost of holding one unit in inventory for one year annual demand Performance Management 16 November 2010 This page is blank November 2010 17 Performance Management This page is blank Performance Management 18 November 2010 LIST OF VERBS USED IN THE QUESTION REQUIREMENTS A list of the learning objectives and verbs that appear in the syllabus and in the question requirements for each question in this paper. It is important that you answer the question according to the definition of the verb. LEARNING OBJECTIVE Level 1 - KNOWLEDGE What you are expected to know. Level 2 - COMPREHENSION What you are expected to understand. VERBS USED DEFINITION List State Define Make a list of Express, fully or clearly, the details/facts of Give the exact meaning of Describe Distinguish Explain Communicate the key features Highlight the differences between Make clear or intelligible/State the meaning or purpose of Recognise, establish or select after consideration Use an example to describe or explain something Identify Illustrate Level 3 - APPLICATION How you are expected to apply your knowledge. Apply Calculate Demonstrate Prepare Reconcile Solve Tabulate Level 4 - ANALYSIS How are you expected to analyse the detail of what you have learned. Level 5 - EVALUATION How are you expected to use your learning to evaluate, make decisions or recommendations. November 2010 Analyse Categorise Compare and contrast Put to practical use Ascertain or reckon mathematically Prove with certainty or to exhibit by practical means Make or get ready for use Make or prove consistent/compatible Find an answer to Arrange in a table Construct Discuss Interpret Prioritise Produce Examine in detail the structure of Place into a defined class or division Show the similarities and/or differences between Build up or compile Examine in detail by argument Translate into intelligible or familiar terms Place in order of priority or sequence for action Create or bring into existence Advise Evaluate Recommend Counsel, inform or notify Appraise or assess the value of Advise on a course of action 19 Performance Management Performance Pillar Management Level Paper P2 - Performance Management November 2010 Wednesday Afternoon Session Performance Management 20 November 2010