Draft the facts of a hypothetical legal dispute involving 2 parties, where the only issue is whether one party's duty to perform the contract is excused by the doctrine of frustration of purpose. Design your hypothetical legal dispute such that each side has a reasonable argument that frustration of purpose either excuses performance or does not excuse performance. a judicial opinion, based on your hypothetical legal dispute you have drafted.

The facts of your hypothetical legal dispute must be incorporated into the "Statement of Facts" section of the judicial opinion and your resolution of the dispute must be incorporated in the "Discussion" section of the judicial opinion. You must also include at least 2 references from the course textbook, case law, or other legal authority sources in Bluebook format. Apply the frustration of purpose doctrine to your hypothetical legal dispute, decide the case, and fully justify your decision in your judicial opinion. Explain whether the frustration of purpose doctrine encourages the moral value of promise-making and promise-keeping in your judicial opinion. Support your position with authority. Incorporate your explanation into the "Discussion" section of your judicial opinion